Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37522644›Full record

SynthesisESC heart failure2023

Efficacy and safety of baroreflex activation therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: systematic review.

Juan Máximo Molina-Linde, David Cordero-Pereda, Elena Baños-Álvarez, Maria Piedad Rosario-Lozano, Juan Antonio Blasco-Amaro

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Early experience with baroreflex activation therapy from a vascular surgery perspective.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan Máximo Molina-LindeHealth Technology Assessment Area-AETSA, Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health-FPS, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0106-5530
David Cordero-PeredaHeart Failure and Cardiomyopathy Unit, Cardiology Service Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Elena Baños-ÁlvarezEpidemiologist at Seville Primary Care Health District, Seville, Spain.
Maria Piedad Rosario-LozanoHealth Technology Assessment Area-AETSA, Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health-FPS, Seville, Spain.
Juan Antonio Blasco-AmaroHealth Technology Assessment Area-AETSA, Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health-FPS, Seville, Spain.
Fundación Progreso y Salud · ESAndalusian Health Service · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ES

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is a possible adjuvant treatment for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and may be an alternative therapy in patients with contraindications or drug intolerance. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAT in patients with HFrEF. The protocol for this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022349175). Searches were conducted using MEDLINE, preMedLine (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Trip Medical Database, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of BAT with pharmacological treatment. We assessed the risk of bias of each study using the Cochrane RoB2 tool and the certainty of the results using the GRADE approach. We performed a meta-analysis of treatment effects using a fixed-effects or random-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity observed. Two studies were included in the meta-analysis (HOPE4HF and BeAT-HF). The results showed that BAT led to statistically significant improvements in New York Heart Association functional class (relative risk 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI, 1.65 to 2.76]), quality of life (difference in means -16.97; 95% CI [-21.87 to -12.07]), 6 min walk test (difference in means 56.54; 95% CI [55.67 to 57.41]) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (difference in means -120.02; 95% CI [-193.58 to -46.45]). The system- and procedure-related complication event-free rate varied from 85.9% to 97%. The results show that BAT is safe and improves functional class, quality of life and congestion in selected patients with HFrEF. Further studies and long-term follow-up are needed to assess efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events and mortality.

Indexed as

BaroreflexHeart FailureStroke VolumeElectric Stimulation TherapyHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeBaroreflex activation therapyHeart failureMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37522644
PMCPMC10567643
OpenAlexW4385406410

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.