Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523094›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2023

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis, stage, and treatment of esophagogastric cancer.

Benthe H Doeve, Jeanne A C Bakx, Peter D Siersema, Camiel Rosman, Nicole C T van Grieken, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Johanna W van Sandick, Marcel Verheij, Maarten F Bijlsma, Rob H A Verhoeven and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER: A 3-YEAR ANALYSIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Benthe H Doeve *Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. b.h.doeve@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8162-0804
Jeanne A C Bakx *Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter D SiersemaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Camiel RosmanDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Nicole C T van GriekenCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark I van Berge HenegouwenCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johanna W van SandickDepartment of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel VerheijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Maarten F BijlsmaCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob H A Verhoeven *Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van Laarhoven *Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLCancer Center Amsterdam · NLDutch Cancer Society · NLErasmus MC · NLOncode Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

ZonMw 10430022010014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire global healthcare system, including oncological care. This study investigated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis, stage, and treatment of esophagogastric cancer in the Netherlands.

methodsPatients diagnosed in 2020 were divided into 5 periods, based on the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, and compared to patients diagnosed in the same period in the years 2017-2019. Patient characteristics and treatments were evaluated for esophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC) separately.

resultsThe number of esophagogastric cancer diagnoses decreased prominently during the first 2 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. During this period, a significantly higher percentage of GC patients was diagnosed with incurable disease (52.5% in 2017-2019 and 67.7% in 2020, p = 0.011). We observed a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with potentially curable EC treated with resection and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (from 35.0% in 2017-2019 to 27.3% in 2020, p < 0.001). Also, patients diagnosed with incurable GC were treated less frequently with a resection (from 4.6% in 2017-2019 to 1.5% in 2020, p = 0.009) in the second half of 2020.

conclusionsCompared to previous years, the number of esophagogastric cancer diagnoses decreased in the first 2 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, while an increased percentage of patients was diagnosed with incurable disease. Both in the curative and palliative setting, patients were less likely to be treated with a surgical resection.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCOVID-19Esophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsCOVID-19 TestingHumansPandemicsCOVID-19Esophageal cancerGastric cancerIncidenceTreatment

Identifiers

PMID37523094
PMCPMC10522512
OpenAlexW4385406026

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.