Evidence mapPaperPMID 37523182Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Prevalence and Landscape of Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Germline Variants and Their Association With Somatic Phenotype in Unselected Chinese Patients With Gynecologic Cancers.

Hao Wen, Qin Xu, Xiujie Sheng, Huawen Li, Xipeng Wang, Xiaohua Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hao WenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Qin XuClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xiujie ShengDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Huawen LiDepartment of Gynecology, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China.
Xipeng WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaohua WuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNFujian Medical University · CNJinan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Understanding germline and somatic status in patients with gynecologic cancers could improve risk assessment and guide therapeutic decision-making. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and landscape of germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and explore whether these variants are associated with somatic phenotypes and cancer risk in unselected patients with gynecologic cancers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study retrospectively enrolled unselected patients in China with a gynecologic cancer, including ovarian, cervical, and endometrial, who underwent tumor-normal sequencing using a 520-gene panel from October 1, 2017, through May 31, 2021. Exposure: Germline variants in gynecologic cancers. Main Outcomes and Measures: The P/LP germline variant rates in 62 cancer predisposition genes were assessed using descriptive statistics. The associations of P/LP variant status with age, somatic profiles, and cancer risk were also investigated using the Fisher exact test or Student t test. Results: A total of 1610 women (median [IQR] age, 54 [47-62] years; 1201 [74.6%] with stage III-IV disease) were included (945 with ovarian cancer, 307 with endometrial cancer, and 358 with cervical cancer). The prevalence of patients with P/LP variants was 20.5% (194 of 945) for ovarian cancer, 13.4% (41 of 307) for endometrial cancer, and 6.4% (23 of 358) for cervical cancer; 95.1% of the germline findings (n = 252) were potentially actionable, mainly in homologous recombination repair (HRR) and mismatch repair genes. Chinese patients with endometrial cancer had a higher rate of P/LP variants than a White population from The Cancer Genome Atlas (42 of 307 [13.7%] vs 24 of 367 [6.5%]; P = .003). In endometrial and cervical cancers, the prevalence of P/LP variants was 12.7% (30 of 237) and 4.8% (13 of 270), respectively, in patients diagnosed at age 45 years or older and increased to 25.0% (9 of 36; P = .09) and 12.0% (10 of 83; P = .04), respectively, for those with an onset age of less than 45 years. Mismatch repair P/LP variants were associated with a younger age at onset for ovarian cancer (46 vs 54 years; P = .02) and endometrial cancer (48 vs 57 years; P < .001), while HRR P/LP variants were associated with a younger age at onset for cervical cancer (46 vs 52 years; P = .04). Carriers of HRR P/LP variants had more prevalent somatic TP53 variants and less common somatic variants in oncogenic driver genes vs noncarriers. BRCA1/2 P/LP variants were also associated with moderate risks for endometrial and cervical cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: This study delineates the landscape of germline P/LP variants in Chinese women with gynecologic cancers. The findings highlight the hereditary factor in cervical cancer that has long been neglected and suggest the importance of next-generation sequencing-based genetic testing with a large gene panel for gynecologic cancers.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansPhenotypePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID37523182
PMCPMC10391307
OpenAlexW4385406473

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.