Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37524554›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Applying an equity lens to hospital safety monitoring: a critical interpretive synthesis protocol.

Joanne Goldman, Lisha Lo, Leahora Rotteau, Brian M Wong, Ayelet Kuper, Maitreya Coffey, Shail Rawal, Myrtede Alfred, Saleem Razack, Marie Pinard and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joanne GoldmanCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada joanne.goldman@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-4070
Lisha LoCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3875-4372
Leahora RotteauCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brian M WongCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ayelet KuperDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maitreya CoffeyThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shail RawalDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Myrtede AlfredDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Saleem RazackDepartment of Pediatrics and Centre for Health Education Scholarship, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Marie PinardCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael PalomoSinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia TrbovichCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8120-5926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHospital safety monitoring systems are foundational to how adverse events are identified and addressed. They are well positioned to bring equity-related safety issues to the forefront for action. However, there is uncertainty about how they have been, and can be, used to achieve this goal. We will undertake a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) to examine how equity is integrated into hospital safety monitoring systems. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow CIS principles. Our initial compass question is: How is equity integrated into safety monitoring systems? We will begin with a structured search strategy of hospital safety monitoring systems in CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO for up to May 2023 to identify papers on safety monitoring systems generally and those linked to equity (eg, racism, social determinants of health). We will also review reference lists of selected papers, contact experts and draw on team expertise. For subsequent literature searching stages, we will use team expertise and expert contacts to purposively search the social science, humanities and health services research literature to support the development of a theoretical understanding of our topic. Following data extraction, we will use interpretive processes to develop themes and a critique of the literature. The above processes of question formulation, article search and selection, data extraction, and critique and synthesis will be iterative and interactive with the goal to develop a theoretical understanding of equity in hospital monitoring systems that will have practice-based implications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require ethical approval because we are reviewing published literature. We aim to publish findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present at conferences.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchHospitalsHumansQualitative ResearchResearch DesignReview Literature as Topichealth equityhealth & safetyquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID37524554
PMCPMC10391806

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.