Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525198›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2023

Impacts of seasonal flooding on geographical access to maternal healthcare in the Barotse Floodplain, Zambia.

Elizabeth Jade Mroz, Thomas Willis, Chris Thomas, Craig Janes, Douglas Singini, Mwimanenwa Njungu, Mark Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth Jade MrozSchool of Geography and water@Leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. gy16e3m@leeds.ac.uk.
Thomas WillisSchool of Geography and water@Leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Chris ThomasLincoln Centre for Water & Planetary Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6 7DW, UK.
Craig JanesSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Douglas SinginiSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Mwimanenwa NjunguSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Mark SmithSchool of Geography and water@Leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeasonal floods pose a commonly-recognised barrier to women's access to maternal services, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Despite their importance, previous GIS models of healthcare access have not adequately accounted for floods. This study developed new methodologies for incorporating flood depths, velocities, and extents produced with a flood model into network- and raster-based health access models. The methodologies were applied to the Barotse Floodplain to assess flood impact on women's walking access to maternal services and vehicular emergency referrals for a monthly basis between October 2017 and October 2018.

methodsInformation on health facilities were acquired from the Ministry of Health. Population density data on women of reproductive age were obtained from the High Resolution Settlement Layer. Roads were a fusion of OpenStreetMap and data manually delineated from satellite imagery. Monthly information on floodwater depth and velocity were obtained from a flood model for 13-months. Referral driving times between delivery sites and EmOC were calculated with network analysis. Walking times to the nearest maternal services were calculated using a cost-distance algorithm.

resultsThe changing distribution of floodwaters impacted the ability of women to reach maternal services. At the peak of the dry season (October 2017), 55%, 19%, and 24% of women had walking access within 2-hrs to their nearest delivery site, EmOC location, and maternity waiting shelter (MWS) respectively. By the flood peak, this dropped to 29%, 14%, and 16%. Complete inaccessibility became stark with 65%, 76%, and 74% unable to access any delivery site, EmOC, and MWS respectively. The percentage of women that could be referred by vehicle to EmOC from a delivery site within an hour also declined from 65% in October 2017 to 23% in March 2018.

conclusionsFlooding greatly impacted health access, with impacts varying monthly as the floodwave progressed. Additional validation and application to other regions is still needed, however our first results suggest the use of a hydrodynamic model permits a more detailed representation of floodwater impact and there is great potential for generating predictive models which will be necessary to consider climate change impacts on future health access.

Indexed as

FloodsHealth Services AccessibilityMaternal Health ServicesAdultFemaleGeographic Information SystemsHealth FacilitiesHumansMaternal HealthPregnancySeasonsZambiaAccess to healthcareCost distance analysisGeographical information systemsHealth geographyMaternal health servicesNetwork analysisSeasonal floods

Identifiers

PMID37525198
PMCPMC10391775

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.