Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525240›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

A novel explainable online calculator for contrast-induced AKI in diabetics: a multi-centre validation and prospective evaluation study.

Mengqing Ma, Xin Wan, Yuyang Chen, Zhichao Lu, Danning Guo, Huiping Kong, Binbin Pan, Hao Zhang, Dawei Chen, Dongxu Xu and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mengqing MaDepartment of Nephrology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.
Xin WanDepartment of Nephrology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, Jiangsu, China.
Yuyang ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.
Zhichao LuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, China.
Danning GuoDepartment of Nephrology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.
Huiping KongDepartment of Nephrology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.
Binbin PanDepartment of Nephrology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, Jiangsu, China.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, Jiangsu, China.
Dawei ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, Jiangsu, China.
Dongxu XuDepartment of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.
Dong SunDepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Hong LangDepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Changgao ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Shu Yang Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Shuyang, 223600, Jiangsu, China.
Tao LiDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Shu Yang Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Shuyang, 223600, Jiangsu, China.
Changchun CaoDepartment of Nephrology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China. caochangchun@njmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1992-4257
Nanjing Medical University · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNXuzhou Medical College · CNGaochun People's Hospital · CNNanjing University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) is a frequent complication, especially in diabetics, and is connected with severe mortality and morbidity in the short and long term. Therefore, we aimed to develop a CIAKI predictive model for diabetic patients.

methods3514 patients with diabetes from four hospitals were separated into three cohorts: training, internal validation, and external validation. We developed six machine learning (ML) algorithms models: random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), logistic regression (LR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator with LR, extreme gradient boosting trees (XGBT), and support vector machine (SVM). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of ML models was compared to the prior score model, and developed a brief CIAKI prediction model for diabetes (BCPMD). We also validated BCPMD model on the prospective cohort of 172 patients from one of the hospitals. To explain the prediction model, the shapley additive explanations (SHAP) approach was used.

resultsIn the six ML models, XGBT performed best in the cohort of internal (AUC: 0.816 (95% CI 0.777-0.853)) and external validation (AUC: 0.816 (95% CI 0.770-0.861)), and we determined the top 15 important predictors in XGBT model as BCPMD model variables. The features of BCPMD included acute coronary syndromes (ACS), urine protein level, diuretics, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%), hemoglobin (g/L), congestive heart failure (CHF), stable Angina, uric acid (umol/L), preoperative diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg), contrast volumes (mL), albumin (g/L), baseline creatinine (umol/L), vessels of coronary artery disease, glucose (mmol/L) and diabetes history (yrs). Then, we validated BCPMD in the cohort of internal validation (AUC: 0.819 (95% CI 0.783-0.855)), the cohort of external validation (AUC: 0.805 (95% CI 0.755-0.850)) and the cohort of prospective validation (AUC: 0.801 (95% CI 0.688-0.887)). SHAP was constructed to provide personalized interpretation for each patient. Our model also has been developed into an online web risk calculator. MissForest was used to handle the missing values of the calculator.

conclusionWe developed a novel risk calculator for CIAKI in diabetes based on the ML model, which can help clinicians achieve real-time prediction and explainable clinical decisions.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryDiabetes MellitusPercutaneous Coronary InterventionHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftContrast-induced acute kidney injuryDiabetes mellitusMachine learningPredictive modelsWeb calculator

Identifiers

PMID37525240
PMCPMC10391987
OpenAlexW4385428461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.