ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023
A novel explainable online calculator for contrast-induced AKI in diabetics: a multi-centre validation and prospective evaluation study.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- An explainable online frailty prediction model for community-dwelling older adults based on machine learning algorithms: a cross-sectional study based on retrospective health data.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- A Systematic Evaluation of Cohort Selection Criteria and Their Impact on Machine Learning Model Performance and Demographic Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes: Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Risk stratification in diabetic kidney disease: a review of prediction models for methodological advances and clinical application.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning studies of drug-induced nephrotoxicity: a scoping review.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
- The relationship between intraoperative hypotension and acute kidney injury in elderly and super elderly patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting acute kidney injury in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a multimodel comparative study.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Acute Kidney Injury Risk Classification.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- Web-Based Explainable Machine Learning-Based Drug Surveillance for Predicting Sunitinib- and Sorafenib-Associated Thyroid Dysfunction: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning Model for Predicting Prognosis in HCC Patients With Diabetes After TACE.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Predict and prevent microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study in Chinese communities.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Risk prediction models for successful discontinuation in acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.iScience · 2024Article
- Explainable Boosting Machine approach identifies risk factors for acute renal failure.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) is a frequent complication, especially in diabetics, and is connected with severe mortality and morbidity in the short and long term. Therefore, we aimed to develop a CIAKI predictive model for diabetic patients.
methods3514 patients with diabetes from four hospitals were separated into three cohorts: training, internal validation, and external validation. We developed six machine learning (ML) algorithms models: random forest (RF), gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), logistic regression (LR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator with LR, extreme gradient boosting trees (XGBT), and support vector machine (SVM). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of ML models was compared to the prior score model, and developed a brief CIAKI prediction model for diabetes (BCPMD). We also validated BCPMD model on the prospective cohort of 172 patients from one of the hospitals. To explain the prediction model, the shapley additive explanations (SHAP) approach was used.
resultsIn the six ML models, XGBT performed best in the cohort of internal (AUC: 0.816 (95% CI 0.777-0.853)) and external validation (AUC: 0.816 (95% CI 0.770-0.861)), and we determined the top 15 important predictors in XGBT model as BCPMD model variables. The features of BCPMD included acute coronary syndromes (ACS), urine protein level, diuretics, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%), hemoglobin (g/L), congestive heart failure (CHF), stable Angina, uric acid (umol/L), preoperative diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg), contrast volumes (mL), albumin (g/L), baseline creatinine (umol/L), vessels of coronary artery disease, glucose (mmol/L) and diabetes history (yrs). Then, we validated BCPMD in the cohort of internal validation (AUC: 0.819 (95% CI 0.783-0.855)), the cohort of external validation (AUC: 0.805 (95% CI 0.755-0.850)) and the cohort of prospective validation (AUC: 0.801 (95% CI 0.688-0.887)). SHAP was constructed to provide personalized interpretation for each patient. Our model also has been developed into an online web risk calculator. MissForest was used to handle the missing values of the calculator.
conclusionWe developed a novel risk calculator for CIAKI in diabetes based on the ML model, which can help clinicians achieve real-time prediction and explainable clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.