Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37526812›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2023

Mechanism of COVID-19-Induced Cardiac Damage from Patient, In Vitro and Animal Studies.

Elizabeth A V Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cytokine storm in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. MRI of cardiac involvement in COVID-19.The British journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Elizabeth A V JonesCentre for Molecular and Vascular Biology, Herestraat 49, Bus 911, 3000, KU, Leuven, Belgium. liz.jones@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2006-7064
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0B5920NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0H7220NH2020 Societal Challenges 848109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThough patient studies have been important for understanding the disease, research done in animals and cell culture complement our knowledge from patient data and provide insight into the mechanism of the disease. Understanding how COVID causes damage to the heart is essential to understanding possible long-term consequences. RECENT

findingsCOVID-19 is primarily a disease that attacks the lungs; however, it is known to have important consequences in many other tissues including the heart. Though myocarditis does occur in some patients, for most cases of cardiac damage, the injury arises from scarring either due to myocardial infarction or micro-infarction. The main focus is on how COVID affects blood flow through the coronaries. We review how endothelial activation leads to a hypercoagulative state in COVID-19. We also emphasize the effects that the cytokine storm can directly have on the regulation of coronary blood flow. Since the main two cell types that can be infected in the heart are pericytes and cardiomyocytes, we further describe the known effects on pericyte function and how that can further lead to microinfarcts within the heart. Though many of these effects are systemic, this review focuses on the consequences on cardiac tissue of this dysregulation and the role that it has in the formation of myocardial scarring.

Indexed as

COVID-19Heart DiseasesAnimalsHumansMyocytes, CardiacSARS-CoV-2COVIDHeartMicrothrombiPericyte

Identifiers

PMID37526812
PMCPMC10589152
OpenAlexW4385443024

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.