ArticlePublic health action2023
Article in Public health action, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn a war-torn African country, Médecins Sans Frontières supports two regional referral hospitals to address emergencies, including the treatment of firearm-related traumas. It facilitates access to healthcare and referrals, which are often hindered due to non-medical reasons.
objectiveTo determine the factors influencing the unfavourable outcome of cases referred for firearm trauma (December 2020-November 2021).
methodThis was a cross-sectional study using routinely collected data.
resultsA total of 381 patients who were victims of firearm-related trauma were admitted, with an average age of 29 years; 28.3% had severe injuries, including thoraco-abdominal injuries and fractures. The mortality rate was 4.9%, and 7.9% left against medical advice. Patients affiliated with the irregular armed forces accounted for 45.4%, and had a two-thirds higher rate of unsuccessful referral for non-medical reasons. Patients with severe injuries at triage, affiliation with the irregular forces and being in the regular army had 2 times (
conclusionSerious cases caused by firearm injuries were more likely to have an adverse outcome. The risk was higher in those with a specific affiliation, who were more often denied access to higher referral care based on socio-political rather than medical reasons.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.