Evidence mapPaperPMID 37530969Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023

Left ventricular structural abnormalities in the assessment of diastolic function in the elderly: source of discrepancies between the 2009 and 2016 criteria.

Vinícius Leite Gonzalez, Angela Barreto Santiago Santos, Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde, Murilo Foppa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vinícius Leite GonzalezPostgraduate Program in Cardiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul., Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-8834
Angela Barreto Santiago SantosPostgraduate Program in Cardiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul., Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-0547
Luis Eduardo Paim RohdePostgraduate Program in Cardiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul., Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6557-393X
Murilo FoppaPostgraduate Program in Cardiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul., Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. mufoppa@hcpa.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2914-4406
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is routinely evaluated in echocardiography to support diagnosis, prognostication, and management of heart failure, a condition highly prevalent in elderly patients. Clinical guidelines were published in 2009, and updated in 2016, pursuing to standardize and improve DD categorization. We aimed to assess the concordance of DD between these two documents in an elderly population and to investigate how left ventricular structural abnormalities (LVSA) impact the reclassification. To evaluate this we analyzed the 308 consecutive transthoracic echocardiograms in patients older than 60 years (70.4 ± 7.7 years-old, 59% women) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria out of the 1438 echocardiograms performed in a tertiary hospital. We found that the prevalence of DD was lower according to the 2016 criteria (64% vs. 91%; p < 0.001), with 207 (67.2%) patients changing category, indicating poor agreement between the guidelines (kappa = 0.21). There were 188 (61%) patients with LVSA, which drove most of the reclassifications in 2016 Grade I DD cases. The prevalence of elevated filling pressures by Doppler halved in this elderly population using the updated recommendations (20.9% vs. 39.2%; p < 0.001). In conclusion the prevalence of DD was lower applying the 2016 guidelines, with a poor agreement with 2009 guidelines in all DD grades. The role of LVSA in reclassifications was particularly evident in Grade I DD, while Doppler parameters drove reclassifications among the more severe grades. If not properly addressed, these discrepancies may undermine the reliance on DD as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, particularly in an elderly population at a higher risk of heart failure.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAgedDiastoleEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsVentricular Function, LeftDiastolic functionDoppler echocardiographyLeft ventricular structural abnormalitiesPractice guideline

Identifiers

PMID37530969
OpenAlexW4385476908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.