Evidence mapPaperPMID 37531593Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Promote Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Adherence Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Emma E Bright, Lauren B Finkelstein, Madeline S Nealis, Sarah R Genung, Jordan Wrigley, Heng Chao J Gu, Sarah J Schmiege, Joanna J Arch

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of telehealth interventions on adherence to endocrine therapy among patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Factors associated with medication adherence to endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer: an analysis based on temporal self-regulation theory.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  13. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the probability of medication adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: a predictive modeling study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Barriers and enablers to integrating physical activity in breast cancer care: A qualitative study using the TDF and COM-B model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma E BrightDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.ORCID 0000-0001-6682-4561
Lauren B FinkelsteinDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.ORCID 0000-0001-7247-9514
Madeline S NealisDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.ORCID 0000-0003-4815-1441
Sarah R GenungDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.ORCID 0000-0002-6413-8899
Jordan WrigleyDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.ORCID 0000-0003-0176-5980
Heng Chao J GuDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.
Sarah J SchmiegeDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health at the Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO.
Joanna J ArchDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.ORCID 0000-0002-6702-095X
University of Colorado Boulder · USColorado School of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) adherence among breast cancer survivors is often suboptimal, leading to higher cancer recurrence and mortality. Intervention studies to promote AET adherence have burgeoned, more than doubling in number since this literature was last reviewed. The current aim is to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to enhance AET adherence and to identify strengths and limitations of existing interventions to inform future research and clinical care.

methodsSystematic searches were conducted in three electronic databases. Studies were included in the systematic review if they examined an intervention for promoting AET adherence among breast cancer survivors. Studies were further included in the meta-analyses if they examined a measure of AET adherence (defined as compliance or persistence beyond initiation) and reported (or provided upon request) sufficient information to calculate an effect size.

resultsOf 5,045 unique records, 33 unique studies representing 375,951 women met inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Interventions that educated patients about how to manage side effects generally failed to improve AET adherence, whereas policy changes that lowered AET costs consistently improved adherence. Medication reminders, communication, and psychological/coping strategies showed varied efficacy. Of the 33 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, 25 studies representing 367,873 women met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant effects of the adherence interventions overall relative to study-specified control conditions (number of studies [k] = 25; odds ratio, 1.412; 95% CI, 1.183 to 1.682;

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first known meta-analysis to demonstrate a significant effect for interventions to promote AET adherence. The systematic review revealed that lowering medication costs and a subgroup of psychosocial and reminder interventions showed the most promise, informing future research, policy, and clinical directions.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsAdaptation, PsychologicalChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMedication Adherence

Identifiers

PMID37531593
PMCPMC10553065
OpenAlexW4385488031

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.