Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37532459›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2023

Diabetic Retinopathy Screening at the Point of Care (DR SPOC): detecting undiagnosed and vision-threatening retinopathy by integrating portable technologies within existing services.

Lakni Shahanika Weerasinghe, Hamish Paul Dunn, Adrian T Fung, Glen Maberly, Ngai Wah Cheung, Daminda P Weerasinghe, Gerald Liew, Helen Do, Tien-Ming Hng, Alison Pryke and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Retinal Neurophysiological Parameters in Young Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Use Of Fundus Photography In The Emergency Room-A Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. 'Whatever the GP says, is what I'll do'-A qualitative study of patient perspectives in accessing primary eye care for type 2 diabetes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lakni Shahanika WeerasingheFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-0067
Hamish Paul DunnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia hamish.dunn@sydney.edu.au.
Adrian T FungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Glen MaberlyFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Ngai Wah CheungDepartment of Endocrinology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia.
Daminda P WeerasingheDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Gerald LiewDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Helen DoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Tien-Ming HngDepartment of Endocrinology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia.
Alison PrykeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Samuel I MarksFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Helen NguyenSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rajini JayaballaDepartment of Endocrinology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia.
Seema GurungDepartment of Endocrinology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia.
Belinda FordFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Ramy H BishayDepartment of Endocrinology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia.
Christian M GirgisFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Gideon Meyerowitz-KatzDepartment of Endocrinology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1156-9345
Lisa KeaySchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew J WhiteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUBlacktown & Mount Druitt Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AUMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a low socioeconomic region of a high-income country, as well as determine the diagnostic utility of point-of-care screening for high-risk populations in tertiary care settings. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes attending foot ulcer or integrated care diabetes clinics at two Western Sydney hospitals (n=273). DR was assessed using portable, two-field, non-mydriatic fundus photography and combined electroretinogram/ pupillometry (ERG). With mydriatic photographs used as the reference standard, sensitivity and specificity of the devices were determined. Prevalence of DR and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) were reported, with multivariate logistic regression used to identify predictors of DR.

resultsAmong 273 patients, 39.6% had any DR, while 15.8% had VTDR, of whom 59.3% and 62.8% were previously undiagnosed, respectively. Non-mydriatic photography demonstrated 20.2% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity for any DR, with a 56.7% screening failure rate. Meanwhile, mydriatic photography produced high-quality images with a 7.6% failure rate. ERG demonstrated 72.5% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity, with a 15.0% failure rate. The RETeval ERG was noted to have an optimal DR cut-off score at 22. Multivariate logistic regression identified an eGFR of ≤29 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionThere is a high prevalence of vision-threatening and undiagnosed DR among patients attending high-risk tertiary clinics in Western Sydney. Point-of-care DR screening using portable, mydriatic photography demonstrates potential as a model of care which is easily accessible, targeted for high-risk populations and substantially enhances DR detection.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMass ScreeningMydriaticsPoint-of-Care SystemsSensitivity and SpecificityMydriaticsDiabetic RetinopathyEarly DiagnosisEyePoint-of-Care Systems

Identifiers

PMID37532459
PMCPMC10401227
OpenAlexW4385481149

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.