ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2023
Research trends on nanomaterials in gastric cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2023.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bibliometric analysis: a study of the chronic atrophic gastritis in gastric cancer (2015-2024).Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Evolutionary dynamics and research hotspots of phage applications againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Advancements and trends in digestive system autotransplantation: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Trends and hot spots in research on the prognostic value of gastric cancer biomarkers in the context of the Lauren classification: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Trend of albumin nanoparticles in oncology: a bibliometric analysis of research progress and prospects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Mapping the evolution and research landscape of ferroptosis-targeted nanomedicine: insights from a scientometric analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Bibliometric analysis of research on gut microbiota and bile acids: publication trends and research frontiers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- A bibliometric worldview of breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer from 2013 to 2023.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Targeting ferroptosis unveils a new era for traditional Chinese medicine: a scientific metrology study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Landscape and evolutionary trends of nanotechnology in cancer radiosensitization.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Article
- The role of gut microbiota-mitochondrial crosstalk in kidney disease: a bibliometric analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Evolutionary applications of electrical stimulation in bone repair: bibliometric trends and temporal dynamics.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Engineered targeted Ce-based MOF nanozymes for ROS scavenging and inflammatory Reprogramming in chronic pancreatitis.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Bibliometric and visualized analysis of nanomedicine research trends for gastric cancer during the early 21st century.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Review
- Targeting cuproptosis opens a new chapter of nanomedicine: a scientometric and graphical analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Research trends and emerging frontiers of tumor-associated macrophages in gastric cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Hydrogel in musculoskeletal diseases: Unraveling trends, research foci, and future trajectories via bibliometric insights (from 2000 to 2025).Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Trends and incidence of stomach cancer in middle-aged and elderly populations: a global burden of disease analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In recent years, an increasing number of studies aimed at designing and developing nanomaterials for use in diagnosing and treating gastric cancer have been conducted. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively assess the current status and trends of the research on the application of nanomaterials in gastric cancer through a bibliometric analysis.
methodsStudies focusing on nanomaterials and gastric cancer were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database and relevant articles were selected for inclusion in the study according to the inclusion criteria. Bibliometric and visual analysis of the included publications was performed using VOSviewer and CiteSpace.
resultsA total of 793 studies were included. An increase in annual publications was observed from 2004 to 2023. China, Iran and the USA were the dominant countries in this field, accounting for 66.1%, 11.5% and 7.2% of publications, respectively. Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Cui DX were the most influential institution and author, respectively. The International Journal of Nanomedicine was the most prolific journal; Biomaterials was the most cited and most cocited journal. Nanomaterial-related drug delivery and anticancer mechanisms were found to be the most widely researched aspects, and green synthesis and anticancer mechanisms are recent research hotspots.
conclusionIn this study, we summarized the characteristics of publications and identified the most influential countries, institutions, authors, journals, hot topics and trends regarding the application of nanomaterials in gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.