Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

A weighted quantile sum regression with penalized weights and two indices.

Stefano Renzetti, Chris Gennings, Stefano Calza

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Relevance and challenges of exposome studies for environmental health research.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.Environmental health perspectives · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefano RenzettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Chris GenningsDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Stefano CalzaDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
University of Brescia · ITIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Statistical Services and Methods Development ResourceU2CES026555 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI TEITELBAUM, SUSAN L · 2015 to 2025
$26.4M
The Mount Sinai Transdisciplinary Center on Early Environmental ExposuresP30ES023515 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Chris Gennings · 2014 to 2026
$21.3M
Methods for Data Integration and Risk Assessment for Environmental MixturesR01ES028811 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI COULL, BRENT ANDREW, GENNINGS, CHRIS · 2018 to 2021
$1.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023515NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028811NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: New statistical methodologies were developed in the last decade to face the challenges of estimating the effects of exposure to multiple chemicals. Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression is a recent statistical method that allows estimating a mixture effect associated with a specific health effect and identifying the components that characterize the mixture effect. Objectives: In this study, we propose an extension of WQS regression that estimates two mixture effects of chemicals on a health outcome in the same model through the inclusion of two indices, one in the positive direction and one in the negative direction, with the introduction of a penalization term. Methods: To evaluate the performance of this new model we performed both a simulation study and a real case study where we assessed the effects of nutrients on obesity among adults using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. Results: The method showed good performance in estimating both the regression parameter and the weights associated with the single elements when the penalized term was set equal to the magnitude of the Akaike information criterion of the unpenalized WQS regression. The two indices further helped to give a better estimate of the parameters [Positive direction Median Error (PME): 0.022; Negative direction Median Error (NME): -0.044] compared to the standard WQS without the penalization term (PME: -0.227; NME: 0.215). In the case study, WQS with two indices was able to find a significant effect of nutrients on obesity in both directions identifying sodium and magnesium as the main actors in the positive and negative association, respectively. Discussion: Through this work, we introduced an extension of WQS regression that improved the accuracy of the parameter estimates when considering a mixture of elements that can have both a protective and a harmful effect on the outcome; and the advantage of adding a penalization term when estimating the weights.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureObesityHumansNutrition Surveysenvironmental mixturenutrientsobesitypenalized weightstwo indicesweighted quantile sum regression

Identifiers

PMID37533534
PMCPMC10392701
OpenAlexW4384694610

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.