ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023
Serum Proteomic Profiling in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential of Breast Milk Exosomes in Modulating Infant Developmental Programming: A Multi-Omics Study Based on a Birth Cohort.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Identifying candidate biomarkers for detecting bronchogenic carcinoma stages using metaheuristic algorithms based on information fusion theory.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Decoding LncRNA in COPD: Unveiling Prognostic and Diagnostic Power and Their Driving Role in Lung Cancer Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Altered levels of IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-5 depend on theFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with high morbidity and mortality rates. This study used proteomic profiling of serum to identify the differentially expressed proteins in COPD patients compared with healthy controls, to expand the knowledge of COPD pathogenesis and to ascertain potential new targets for diagnosis and treatment of COPD. Methods: Serum samples were collected from 56 participants (COPD group n = 28; Healthy Control group n = 28). A data-independent acquisition quantitative proteomics approach was used to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between the two groups. Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway functional enrichment, and protein-protein interaction analyses of DEPs were conducted to identify their relevant biological processes, cellular components, and related pathways. We used a parallel reaction monitoring (PRM)-based targeted quantitative proteomics approach to validate those findings. Results: Of 8484 peptides identified by searching the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot knowledgebase, 867 proteins were quantifiable, of which 20 were upregulated and 35 were downregulated in the COPD group. GO functional annotation indicated that the subcellular localization of most DEPs was extracellular. The top three molecular functions of the DEPs were signaling receptor binding, antigen binding, and immunoglobulin receptor binding. The most relevant biological process was immune response. The transforming growth factor-β signaling pathway, Conclusion: This study using data-independent acquisition analyses with PRM confirmation of findings identified 11 DEPs in the serum of patients with COPD. These DEPs are potential diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers or may be future targets for the treatment of COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.