Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37536338›Full record

ArticleCell2023

Chromosome-level organization of the regulatory genome in the Drosophila nervous system.

Giriram Mohana, Julien Dorier, Xiao Li, Marion Mouginot, Rebecca C Smith, Héléna Malek, Marion Leleu, Daniel Rodriguez, Jenisha Khadka, Patrycja Rosa and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcription and Three-Dimensional Genome Organization: Cause, Consequence, or Coordination?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolution of compound eye cell types shapes visual behaviors acrossbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Reversing aging-like 3D genome disorganization in abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Giriram MohanaCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Julien DorierBioinformatics Competence Center, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Bioinformatics Competence Center, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Xiao LiLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Marion MouginotCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rebecca C SmithBrain Mind Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Héléna MalekCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marion LeleuBioinformatics Competence Center, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Bioinformatics Competence Center, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daniel RodriguezCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jenisha KhadkaCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrycja RosaFaculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics, University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Pascal CousinCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christian IseliBioinformatics Competence Center, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Bioinformatics Competence Center, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Simon RestrepoArcoris bio AG, Lüssirainstrasse 52, 6300 Zug, Switzerland.
Nicolas GuexBioinformatics Competence Center, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Bioinformatics Competence Center, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Brian D McCabeBrain Mind Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aleksander JankowskiFaculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics, University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: aleksander.jankowski@uw.edu.pl.
Michael S LevineLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. Electronic address: msl2@princeton.edu.
Maria Cristina GambettaCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: mariacristina.gambetta@unil.ch.

Funding

Visualization of gene activity in the Drosophila embryoR35GM118147 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Michael Steven Levine · 2016 to 2026
$6.7M
Control of the 4D chromatin landscape underlying gene activity during developmentU01DK127429 · NIDDK · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI GREGOR, THOMAS, LEVINE, MICHAEL STEVEN · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK127429NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have identified topologically associating domains (TADs) as basic units of genome organization. We present evidence of a previously unreported level of genome folding, where distant TAD pairs, megabases apart, interact to form meta-domains. Within meta-domains, gene promoters and structural intergenic elements present in distant TADs are specifically paired. The associated genes encode neuronal determinants, including those engaged in axonal guidance and adhesion. These long-range associations occur in a large fraction of neurons but support transcription in only a subset of neurons. Meta-domains are formed by diverse transcription factors that are able to pair over long and flexible distances. We present evidence that two such factors, GAF and CTCF, play direct roles in this process. The relative simplicity of higher-order meta-domain interactions in Drosophila, compared with those previously described in mammals, allowed the demonstration that genomes can fold into highly specialized cell-type-specific scaffolds that enable megabase-scale regulatory associations.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, InsectDrosophilaAnimalsCCCTC-Binding FactorChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PackagingDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression RegulationGenome, InsectMammalsNeurogenesisNeuronsTranscription FactorsCCCTC-Binding FactorChromatinCTCF protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsTranscription FactorsTrl protein, Drosophilachromosomal loopDrosophilagene regulationgenome architecturegenome organizationnervous systemneuronTADtranscription

Identifiers

PMID37536338
PMCPMC10529364

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.