Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37537524›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Genetic architecture and key regulatory genes of fatty acid composition in Gushi chicken breast muscle determined by GWAS and WGCNA.

Shengxin Fan, Pengtao Yuan, Shuaihao Li, Hongtai Li, Bin Zhai, Yuanfang Li, Hongyuan Zhang, Jinxin Gu, Hong Li, Yadong Tian and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Application of GWAS and mGWAS in Livestock and Poultry Breeding.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shengxin Fan *College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Pengtao Yuan *College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Shuaihao LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Hongtai LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Bin ZhaiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Yuanfang LiSchool of Medicine and Health, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, HeiLongJiang, China.
Hongyuan ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Jinxin GuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Hong LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Yadong TianCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Xiangtao KangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Yanhua ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China. YHZhang@henau.edu.cn.
Guoxi LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, No.15 Longzihu University Area, Zhengzhou New District, Zhengzhou, 450002, China. liguoxi0914@126.com.
Henan Agricultural University · CNChina Shenhua Energy (China) · CNHarbin Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatty acids composition in poultry muscle is directly related to its tenderness, flavour, and juiciness, whereas its genetic mechanisms have not been elucidated. In this study, the genetic structure and key regulatory genes of the breast muscle fatty acid composition of local Chinese chicken, Gushi-Anka F2 resource population by integrating genome-wide association study (GWAS) and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) strategies. GWAS was performed based on 323,306 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) obtained by genotyping by sequencing (GBS) method and 721 chickens from the Gushi-Anka F2 resource population with highly variable fatty acid composition traits in the breast muscle. And then, according to the transcriptome data of the candidate genes that were obtained and phenotypic data of fatty acid composition traits in breast muscle of Gushi chickens at 14, 22, and 30 weeks of age, we conducted a WGCNA.

resultsA total of 128 suggestive significantly associated SNPs for 11 fatty acid composition traits were identified and mapped on chromosomes (Chr) 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 17, 21, and 27. Of these, the two most significant SNPs were Chr13:5,100,140 (P = 4.56423e-10) and Chr13:5,100,173 (P = 4.56423e-10), which explained 5.6% of the phenotypic variation in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). In addition, six fatty acid composition traits, including C20:1, C22:6, saturated fatty acid (SFA), unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), PUFA, and average chain length (ACL), were located in the same QTL intervals on Chr13. We obtained 505 genes by scanning the linkage disequilibrium (LD) regions of all significant SNPs and performed a WGCNA based on the transcriptome data of the above 505 genes. Combining two strategies, 9 hub genes (ENO1, ADH1, ASAH1, ADH1C, PIK3CD, WISP1, AKT1, PANK3, and C1QTNF2) were finally identified, which could be the potential candidate genes regulating fatty acid composition traits in chicken breast muscle.

conclusionThe results of this study deepen our understanding of the genetic mechanisms underlying the regulation of fatty acid composition traits, which is helpful in the design of breeding strategies for the subsequent improvement of fatty acid composition in poultry muscle.

Indexed as

ChickensGenome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsFatty AcidsGenes, RegulatorMusclesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideFatty AcidsBreast muscleChickenFatty acid compositionGenetic structureGWASWGCNA

Identifiers

PMID37537524
PMCPMC10398928
OpenAlexW4385550702

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.