ArticleHeliyon2023
Associations between laboratory variables and clinical features in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 after non-mRNA vaccination in China: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Based on the data during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuxi city in China, we explored the relationship between laboratory variables and clinical features in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 after non-mRNA vaccination, and attempted to identify the significant impact of vaccination and COVID-19 infection on humans. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was carried out. Patients who received non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and were hospitalized with COVID-19 between June 28, 2022, and July 24, 2022 were included. The correlation between different vaccine statuses, the time to negative PCR test, and biochemical parameters were investigated. Results: All patients had a mild COVID-19 disease. The number of vaccine doses exerted no effects on the time to negative PCR test (P = 0.559). No differences were evident among inactivated, adenoviral-vectored, and recombinant subunit vaccines in the time to negative PCR test.Patients who just received one dose had significantly lower blood glucose levels than those who received three doses (P = 0.024), whereas two doses had no effect on blood glucose levels (one dose vs. two doses, P = 0.223; two doses vs. three doses, P = 0.457).Body temperature (β = 0.168, P = 0.011) and the percentage of lymphocytes (β = -0.219, P = 0.001) were substantially correlated with the time to COVID-19 negative PCR test. The prolonged stay was linked to a rise in GOT that fell within the usual range (P = 0.025).The percentage of lymphocytes (P = 0.007) and serum potassium (P = 0.004) were concordant with the marked change in body temperature. Conclusions: The dose and type of vaccination had no effect on the time to COVID-19 negative PCR test in patients with mild COVID-19. Comparing the first dose with the booster dose, the blood glucose levels increased within the normal range. The period at which the COVID-19 nucleic acid turned negative correlated with body temperature, the proportion of lymphocytes, GOT, and serum potassium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.