Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37539311›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Impact of probiotics on cognition and constipation in the elderly: A meta-analysis.

Neeraja Recharla, Jihee Choi, Pradeep Puligundla, Seon-Joo Park, Hae-Jeung Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Smart CaCOScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Probiotics and prebiotics in the treatment of functional constipation in the elderly individuals.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neeraja RecharlaInstitute for Aging and Clinical Nutrition Research, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13120, Republic of Korea.
Jihee ChoiInstitute for Aging and Clinical Nutrition Research, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13120, Republic of Korea.
Pradeep PuligundlaDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Bionanotechnology, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13120, Republic of Korea.
Seon-Joo ParkInstitute for Aging and Clinical Nutrition Research, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13120, Republic of Korea.
Hae-Jeung LeeInstitute for Aging and Clinical Nutrition Research, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13120, Republic of Korea.
Gachon University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive decline and constipation are common complications in the elderly. Probiotics are potential therapeutic agents to ameliorate cognitive impairment through gut-brain axis. Several clinical studies have investigated the beneficial effects of probiotics on cognitive impairment and constipation in elderly. However, a quantitative meta-analysis is required to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics on cognitive function and constipation. Thirteen clinical studies were included in this meta-analysis. We examined the risk of bias assessment and heterogeneity of eight studies for cognition and five studies for constipation, followed by group and subgroup meta-analyses using a random-effects model to evaluate the potential of probiotic supplements on cognition function and constipation in aged people. The results of the pooled meta-analysis revealed that probiotic supplementation did not improve the cognitive rating scale assessment for all studies (estimate = 0.13; 95%CI [-0.18, 0.43];

Indexed as

Cognitive functionConstipationDefecation frequencyElderMeta-analysisMicrobiotaProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID37539311
PMCPMC10395539
OpenAlexW4384301630

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.