ArticleCureus2023
Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center From Eastern India.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background To contain the spread of infection and reduce the burden on healthcare infrastructure, many countries globally adopted a lockdown strategy during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Hospitals were converted to dedicated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) centers, and non-COVID-19 patients were intervened on a triage basis. During this time, only emergency procedures were performed. The impact of this lockdown strategy during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on various gastrointestinal endoscopy interventions remains unknown. Methodology In this retrospective, observational study conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar from March 25 to September 30, 2020, data related to clinical profile, indication, and endoscopic interventions performed in reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-negative patients with the use of personal protective kits were analyzed and compared with the historical controls. Results A total of 2,282 patients were admitted and 422 endoscopic procedures were performed during the six-month study period with an intervention rate of 18.49%. The most common procedure was upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (228, 58.13%), followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (88, 22.50%). Chronic liver disease (CLD) (144 patients) followed by malignancy (111 patients) were the most common diagnosis. During the first phase of the lockdown (March to May), only 52 procedures were performed (52 vs. 506). None of the patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound. In 2019, 4,501 patients were admitted and 1,224 procedures were performed with an intervention rate of 27.19 (p < 0.0001). None of the staff of the Department of Gastroenterology developed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during this period. Conclusions There was a significant drop in endoscopic procedures during the lockdown and most of the esophagoduodenoscopy procedures were done for CLD and ERCP for biliary tract malignancy. Endoscopic procedures done on RT-PCR for COVID-19-negative patients were safe using personal protective kits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.