Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37539607›Full record

ReviewActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2023

Safety and adverse reactions in subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy: a review.

Cristoforo Incorvaia, Carlo Cavaliere, Jan W Schroeder, Gualtiero Leo, Francesca Nicoletta, Alessandro Barone, Erminia Ridolo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristoforo Incorvaia. cristoforo.incorvaia@gmail.com.
Carlo CavaliereDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. carlo.cavaliere@uniroma1.it.
Jan W SchroederAllergy and Immunology polispecialistic medical department. Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy. jan.schroeder@ospedaleniguarda.it.
Gualtiero LeoHigh Specialization in Allergy and Asthma. Department of Childhood and Developmental Medicine, Fatebenefratelli and Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy. gualtiero.leo@icp.mi.it.
Francesca NicolettaAllergy and Clinical Immunology, Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. francesca.nicoletta@unipr.it.
Alessandro BaroneAllergy and Clinical Immunology, Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. alessandro.barone@unipr.it.
Erminia RidoloUniversity of Parma, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Parma, Italy. . erminia.ridolo@unipr.it.
University of Parma · ITASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITMotorola (United States) · USSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment which acts on the causes of allergic diseases by modifying their natural history. In the eighties subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with high biological power allergen extracts caused a number of severe systemic reactions and also fatalities in the UK and the US, resulting in its limitation and in the introduction of other routes of administration. A decisive advance for SCIT safety was understanding that the major cause of mortality was injecting the allergen extract to patients with uncontrolled asthma at the time of injection. AREAS COVERED: This awareness resulted in a significant decrease in fatalities, but not in their abolition. In 2019, an increase in SCIT-related mortality was observed, suggesting to continue the research for still unidentified factors favoring severe reactions, such as the administration of a wrong extract or of allergen doses higher than listed, unintentional intravenous administration, and missed dose reduction after protracted interruption. Moreover, in the context of the improving of the safety, the role played in tolerance-promoting by adjuvants such as CpG oligodeoxynucleotides has to be taken into account, as well as the potential preventive effect performed by the monoclonal anti-IgE antibody omalizumab against the exacerbation of severe reactions during SCIT.

conclusionThe safety of SCIT is good, but the research to improve it further must continue. In particular, the pathophysiological mechanisms related to AIT for inhalants and for Hymenoptera venom should be studied, based on the evident diversity demonstrated by the complete absence of fatal reactions to Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy from its introduction in comparison with the history of serious and fatal offenses examined in this review.

Indexed as

AsthmaHypersensitivityAllergensDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansInjections, SubcutaneousAllergens

Identifiers

PMID37539607
PMCPMC10440773
OpenAlexW4385563501

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.