Evidence mapPaperPMID 37540263Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2023

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on training conditions and education in oncologic disciplines: a survey-based analysis.

Maike Trommer, Anne Adams, Carolin Bürkle, Stefanie Brunner, Andrea Grandoch, Alexandra Geffroy, Cindy Franklin, Asmae Gassa, Anna-Katharina Meißner, Sibylle Mellinghoff and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The underestimated role of pioneering women in radiation oncology: lessons from the past for today's practice.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gender-specific Differences in Radiation Oncology Training during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Subanalysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maike TrommerKlinik und Poliklinik für Radioonkologie, Cyberknife- und Strahlentherapie, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. maike.trommer@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2864-4273
Anne AdamsInstitut für Medizinische Statistik und Bioinformatik, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Carolin BürkleMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Stefanie BrunnerCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Andrea GrandochCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Alexandra GeffroyKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg im Breisgau, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Cindy FranklinCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Asmae GassaCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Anna-Katharina MeißnerCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Sibylle MellinghoffCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Shachi Jenny SharmaCenter for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Silvia SchrittenlocherZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Luisa WitteUrologische Klinik, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Simone MarnitzKlinik und Poliklinik für Radioonkologie, Cyberknife- und Strahlentherapie, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEBundeswehrkrankenhaus · DELMU Klinikum · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in global health care. Medical societies had to update guidelines and enhance new services such as video consultations. Cancer treatment had to be modified. The aim of this study is to ensure optimal care for cancer patients with the help of high-quality training even in times of crisis. We therefore conducted a nationwide survey of physicians in training in oncological disciplines during the pandemic to assess the impact on their education.

methodsThe survey was sent to tumour centres, hospitals, specialist societies, and working and junior research groups and distributed via newsletters and homepages. Interim results and a call for participation were published as a poster (DEGRO) [26] and in the German Cancer Society (DKG) journal FORUM [42]. The survey contained 53 questions on conditions of education and training and on clinical and scientific work. Statistics were carried out with LimeSurvey and SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

resultsBetween February and November 2022, 450 participants answered the survey, with radio-oncologists being the largest group (28%). Most colleagues (63%) had access to digital training methods. Virtual sessions were rated as a good alternative, especially as multidisciplinary meetings (54%) as well as in-house and external training programs (48%, 47%). The time spent by training supervisors on education was rated as less than before the pandemic by 57%. Half of all participants perceived communication (54%), motivation (44%) and atmosphere (50%) in the team as bad. The participants felt strongly burdened by extra work (55%) and by a changed team atmosphere (49%). One third felt a change in the quality of training during the pandemic and rated it as negative (35%). According to 37% of the participants, this had little influence on their own quality of work. Additional subgroup analyses revealed significant differences in gender, specialty and education level.

conclusionIn order to improve oncology training in times of crisis, access to digital training options and meetings should be ensured. Participants wish for regular team meetings in person to enable good team spirit, compensation for overtime work and sufficient time for training supervisors for discussion and feedback.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsEducational StatusHumansPandemicsCancer health services researchCorona pandemicEducational developmentFurther educationOncology training

Identifiers

PMID37540263
PMCPMC10449661
OpenAlexW4385564804

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.