ArticleGenome research2023
Assessing transcriptomic reidentification risks using discriminative sequence models.
Article in Genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics-driven precision medicine.iMeta · 2026Review
- scDesignPop generates realistic population-scale single-cell RNA-seq for power analysis, benchmarking, and privacy protection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Privacy of single-cell gene expression data.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Privacy-Enhancing Technologies in Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression data provide molecular insights into the functional impact of genetic variation, for example, through expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). With an improving understanding of the association between genotypes and gene expression comes a greater concern that gene expression profiles could be matched to genotype profiles of the same individuals in another data set, known as a linking attack. Prior works show such a risk could analyze only a fraction of eQTLs that is independent owing to restrictive model assumptions, leaving the full extent of this risk incompletely understood. To address this challenge, we introduce the discriminative sequence model (DSM), a novel probabilistic framework for predicting a sequence of genotypes based on gene expression data. By modeling the joint distribution over all known eQTLs in a genomic region, DSM improves the power of linking attacks with necessary calibration for linkage disequilibrium and redundant predictive signals. We show greater linking accuracy of DSM compared with existing approaches across a range of attack scenarios and data sets including up to 22,288 individuals, suggesting that DSM helps uncover a substantial additional risk overlooked by previous studies. Our work provides a unified framework for assessing the privacy risks of sharing diverse omics data sets beyond transcriptomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.