Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37542114›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2023

Understanding plant pathogen interactions using spatial and single-cell technologies.

Jie Zhu, Alba Moreno-Pérez, Gitta Coaker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Volatile Organic Compound Profile Changes inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Beyond Resistance Genes: Silencing Susceptibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie Zhu *Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5217-6249
Alba Moreno-Pérez *Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5089-8654
Gitta CoakerDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. glcoaker@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0899-2449
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Immune Perception of Bacterial Pathogens in PlantsR35GM136402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Gitta Laurel Coaker · 2020 to 2026
$3.0M
NIH HHS R35GM136402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are in contact with diverse pathogens and microorganisms. Intense investigation over the last 30 years has resulted in the identification of multiple immune receptors in model and crop species as well as signaling overlap in surface-localized and intracellular immune receptors. However, scientists still have a limited understanding of how plants respond to diverse pathogens with spatial and cellular resolution. Recent advancements in single-cell, single-nucleus and spatial technologies can now be applied to plant-pathogen interactions. Here, we outline the current state of these technologies and highlight outstanding biological questions that can be addressed in the future.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsPlantsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID37542114
PMCPMC10403533
OpenAlexW4385580540

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.