Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37543544›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2024

Breaking prolonged sitting increases 24-h physical activity and self-perceived energy levels but does not acutely affect cognition in healthy adults.

Feng-Chih Kuo, Yun-Ting Lin, Ting-Yu Chueh, Yu-Kai Chang, Tsung-Min Hung, Yung-Chih Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of breaking up prolonged sitting with physical activity on executive function: a three-level meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Feng-Chih KuoDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yun-Ting LinDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ting-Yu ChuehDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Kai ChangDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tsung-Min HungDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yung-Chih ChenDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd, Taipei, Taiwan. yc.chen@ntnu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0133-717X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is unknown whether predetermined (un)interrupted sitting within a laboratory setting will induce compensatory changes in human behaviours (energy intake and physical activity) once people return to a free-living environment. The effects of breaking up prolonged sitting on cognition are also unclear.

methodsTwenty-four (male = 13) healthy participants [age 31 ± 8 y, BMI 22.7 ± 2.3 kg/m

resultsThere were no differences between trials in eating behaviour and spontaneous physical activity (both, p > 0.05) in free-living conditions, resulting in greater overall total step counts [11,680 (10740,12620) versus 6049 (4845,7253) steps] and physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) over 24-h period in ACTIVE compared to SIT (all, p < 0.05). Greater self-perceived levels of energy and lower blood glucose iAUC were found in ACTIVE trial compared to SIT trial (both, p < 0.05). No differences were found in cognitive performance between trials (all, p > 0.05).

conclusionBreaking up sitting does not elicit subsequent behavioural compensation, resulting in greater 24-h step counts and PAEE in healthy adults. Breaking up sitting reduces postprandial glucose concentrations and elicits greater self-perceived energy levels, but these positive effects do not acutely translate into improved cognitive function.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseSitting PositionAdultCognitionCross-Over StudiesExerciseFatigueHumansInsulinMalePostprandial PeriodSedentary BehaviorWalkingYoung AdultBlood GlucoseInsulinBreaking up sittingEating behaviourEnergy balanceExecutive functionSpontaneous physical activity

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.