Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37545735›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

A protocol for a multicenter randomized and personalized controlled trial using rTMS in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Marie M Vitello, Martin J Rosenfelder, Paolo Cardone, Masachika Niimi, Lina Willacker, Aurore Thibaut, Nicolas Lejeune, Steven Laureys, Andreas Bender, Olivia Gosseries

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04401319 (Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04401319 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LiegeRan2024 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsDisorder of ConsciousnessArmsSham Stimulation for Crossover Study, DLPFC Stimulation for Crossover Study, AG Stimulation for Crossover Study, Sham Stimulation for Parallel Study, DLPFC Stimulation for Parallel Study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Brain health: A concern for anaesthesiologists and intensivists.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marie M VitelloComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Martin J RosenfelderDepartment of Neurology, Therapiezentrum Burgau, Burgau, Germany.
Paolo CardoneComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Masachika NiimiComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Lina WillackerDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital of Munich, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Aurore ThibautComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Nicolas LejeuneComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Steven LaureysComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Andreas BenderDepartment of Neurology, Therapiezentrum Burgau, Burgau, Germany.
Olivia GosseriesComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Improving the functional recovery of patients with DoC remains one of the greatest challenges of the field. Different theories exist about the role of the anterior (prefrontal areas) versus posterior (parietal areas) parts of the brain as hotspots for the recovery of consciousness. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a powerful non-invasive brain stimulation technique for the treatment of DoC. However, a direct comparison of the effect of TMS treatment on the front versus the back of the brain has yet to be performed. In this study, we aim to assess the short- and long-term effects of frontal and parietal rTMS on DoC recovery and characterize responders phenotypically. Methods/design: Ninety patients with subacute and prolonged DoC will be included in a two-part multicenter prospective study. In the first phase (randomized controlled trial, RCT), patients will undergo four rTMS sessions in a crossover design over 10 days, targeting (i) the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and (ii) the left angular gyrus (AG), as well as (iii & iv) their sham alternatives. In the second phase (longitudinal personalized trial), patients will receive personalized stimulations for 20 working days targeting the brain area that showed the best results in the RCT and will be randomly assigned to either active or sham intervention. The effects of rTMS on neurobehavioral and neurophysiological functioning in patients with DoC will be evaluated using clinical biomarkers of responsiveness (i.e., the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised; CRS-R), and electrophysiological biomarkers (e.g., power spectra, functional and effective connectivity, perturbational complexity index before and after intervention). Functional long-term outcomes will be assessed at 3 and 6 months post-intervention. Adverse events will be recorded during the treatment phase. Discussion: This study seeks to identify which brain region (front or back) is best to stimulate for the treatment of patients with DoC using rTMS, and to characterize the neural correlates of its action regarding recovery of consciousness and functional outcome. In addition, we will define the responders' profile based on patients' characteristics and functional impairments; and develop biomarkers of responsiveness using EEG analysis according to the clinical responsiveness to the treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04401319, Clinicaltrials.gov, n° NCT04401319.

Indexed as

angular gyruscomadorsolateral prefrontal cortexminimally conscious statenon-invasive brain stimulationtreatmentunresponsive wakefulness syndromevegetative state

Identifiers

PMID37545735
PMCPMC10401598

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.