Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37546490›Full record

ArticleBelitung nursing journal2022

Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Filipino version of the Caring Behaviors Inventory.

Reiner Lorenzo Tamayo, Dan Louie Renz Tating, Ericka Louise Gilo, Hannah Kristine Mugol, Karen Grace Laureta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reiner Lorenzo TamayoNightingale Research Solutions, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-4341
Dan Louie Renz TatingNightingale Research Solutions, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8121-2774
Ericka Louise GiloNightingale Research Solutions, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6567-9745
Hannah Kristine MugolNightingale Research Solutions, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8518-4245
Karen Grace LauretaNightingale Research Solutions, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-6941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The way patients perceive nurses' caring behaviors can potentially impact patient outcomes and satisfaction. Studies have revealed incongruence between nurses' and patients' perceptions with regard to which behaviors are considered caring. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a cross-cultural validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI-16), a self-report questionnaire, from English to Filipino. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design involving forward and back-translation with bilingual translators, expert validation, and a survey in a sample of patients and nurses was used. The psychometric evaluation used a sample of 142 staff nurses and 180 hospitalized patients. Exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability, and inferential statistics were used for data analysis. Results: The Filipino version of the CBI-16 (CBI-16-FIL) had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.95) and a unidimensional factor structure (accounted for 85% of total variance). The CBI-16-FIL was found to be a valid, reliable, and unidimensional tool to measure the perceptions of nurse caring behaviors in the Philippines. Conclusion: The CBI-16-FIL can be used to measure perceptions of nurse caring behaviors. There is a need for further studies involving other cultures, dyadic samples of nurses and patients, and larger sample sizes.

Indexed as

Caring Behaviors InventoryCBIcultural issuesinstrument validationnurse-patient interactionPhilippines

Identifiers

PMID37546490
PMCPMC10401363

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.