ArticleEcology and evolution2023
The characterization of toll-like receptor repertoire in
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Underwater Photogrammetry for the Study of Vulnerable Benthic Species: The Case ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Surviving the collapse: unprecedented densities of the critically endangered fan mussel Pinna nobilis in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Genomics ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- ChasingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- The characterization of toll-like receptor repertoire inEcology and evolution · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fan mussel
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.