ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
How cell penetrating peptides behave differently from pore forming peptides: structure and stability of induced transmembrane pores.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptide induced trans-membrane pore formation is commonplace in biology. Examples of transmembrane pores include pores formed by antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) in bacterial membranes and eukaryotic membranes, respectively. In general, however, transmembrane pore formation depends on peptide sequences, lipid compositions and intensive thermodynamic variables and is difficult to observe directly under realistic solution conditions, with structures that are challenging to measure directly. In contrast, the structure and phase behavior of peptide-lipid systems are relatively straightforward to map out experimentally for a broad range of conditions. Cubic phases are often observed in systems involving pore forming peptides; however, it is not clear how the structural tendency to induce negative Gaussian curvature (NGC) in such phases is quantitatively related to the geometry of biological pores. Here, we leverage the theory of anisotropic inclusions and devise a facile method to estimate transmembrane pore sizes from geometric parameters of cubic phases measured from small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and show that such estimates compare well with known pore sizes. Moreover, our model suggests that whereas AMPs can induce stable transmembrane pores for membranes with a broad range of conditions, pores formed by CPPs are highly labile, consistent with atomistic simulations.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.