Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37547273›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2023

Real-life comparison of mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection at risk for clinical progression treated with molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir during the Omicron era in Italy: a nationwide, cohort study.

Carlo Torti, Pier Paolo Olimpieri, Paolo Bonfanti, Carlo Tascini, Simone Celant, Danilo Tacconi, Emanuele Nicastri, Evelina Tacconelli, Bruno Cacopardo, Alessandro Perrella and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CROI 2026: Acute and Postacute COVID-19.Topics in antiviral medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Carlo TortiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Pier Paolo OlimpieriItalian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Paolo BonfantiFondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Carlo TasciniDepartment of Medicine (DAME), Infectious Diseases Clinic, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Simone CelantItalian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Danilo TacconiDepartment of Specialised and Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.
Emanuele NicastriNational Institute for Infectious Disease Lazzaron Spallanzani, IRCCS, Via Portuense 292, 00149, Rome, Italy.
Evelina TacconelliInfectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.
Bruno CacopardoDepartment of Internal and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania School of Medicine, Catania, Italy.
Alessandro PerrellaDivision Emerging Infectious Disease and High Contagiousness, D. Cotugno Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Giovanni Battista BuccolieroInfectious Diseases Unit, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Taranto, 74121 Taranto, Italy.
Giustino ParrutiDepartment of Medicine, Infectious Disease Unit, Pescara General Hospital, Pescara, Italy.
Matteo BassettiDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Carlo BiagettiUnit of Infectious disease Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.
Andrea GiacomettiAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Elke Maria ErneDepartment of Infectious Disease, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Italy.
Maria FrontutoInfectious Diseases Unit, A.O.R. San Carlo, Potenza, Italy.
Massimiliano LanzafameDepartment of Medical, Infectious Diseases Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Valentina SummaItalian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra SpagnoliDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Annarita VestriDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni Di PerriDepartment of Medical Sciences at the Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Torino, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Torino, Italy.
Pierluigi RussoItalian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Giorgio PalùItalian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone 181, 00187 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Comparative data on mortality in COVID-19 patients treated with molnupiravir or with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir are inconclusive. We therefore compared all-cause mortality in community-dwelling COVID-19 patients treated with these drugs during the Omicron era. Methods: Data collected in the nationwide, population-based, cohort of patients registered in the database of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) were used. To increase completeness of the recorded deaths and date correctness, a cross-check with the National Death Registry provided by the Ministry of the Interior was performed. We included in this study all patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 treated within 5 days after the test date and symptom onset between February 8 and April 30, 2022. All-cause mortalities by day 28 were compared between the two treatment groups after balancing for baseline characteristics using weights obtained from a gradient boosting machine algorithm. Findings: In the considered timeframe, 17,977 patients treated with molnupiravir and 11,576 patients with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir were included in the analysis. Most patients (25,617/29,553 = 86.7%) received a full vaccine course including the booster dose. A higher crude incidence rate of all-cause mortality was found among molnupiravir users (51.83 per 100,000 person-days), compared to nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir users (22.29 per 100,000 person-days). However, molnupiravir-treated patients were older than those treated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir and differences between the two populations were found as far as types of co-morbidities were concerned. For this reason, we compared the weight-adjusted cumulative incidences using the Aalen estimator and found that the adjusted cumulative incidence rates were 1.23% (95% CI 1.07%-1.38%) for molnupiravir-treated and 0.78% (95% CI 0.58%-0.98%) for nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir-treated patients (adjusted log rank p = 0.0002). Moreover, the weight-adjusted mixed-effect Cox model including Italian regions and NHS centers as random effects and treatment as the only covariate confirmed a significant reduced risk of death in patients treated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir. Lastly, a significant reduction in the risk of death associated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir was confirmed in patient subgroups, such as in females, fully vaccinated patients, those treated within day 2 since symptom onset and patients without (haemato)-oncological diseases. Interpretation: Early initiation of nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir was associated for the first time with a significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality by day 28 compared to molnupiravir, both in the overall population and in patient subgroups, including those fully vaccinated with the booster dose. Funding: This study did not receive funding.

Indexed as

COVID-19EffectivenessMolnupiravirNirmatrelvir/ritonavirReal-worldSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37547273
PMCPMC10398591

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.