Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548242›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Cellular heterogeneity of the developing worker honey bee (Apis mellifera) pupa: a single cell transcriptomics analysis.

Anirudh Patir, Anna Raper, Robert Fleming, Beth E P Henderson, Lee Murphy, Neil C Henderson, Emily L Clark, Tom C Freeman, Mark W Barnett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anirudh PatirThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
Anna RaperThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
Robert FlemingThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
Beth E P HendersonThe Queen's Medical Research Institute, Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.
Lee MurphyEdinburgh Clinical Research Facility, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Neil C HendersonThe Queen's Medical Research Institute, Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.
Emily L ClarkThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
Tom C FreemanThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
Mark W BarnettThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBRoslin Institute · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S02008X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/10002070Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W018772Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X010945/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 219542/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that animals pollinate 87.5% of flowering plants worldwide and that managed honey bees (Apis mellifera) account for 30-50% of this ecosystem service to agriculture. In addition to their important role as pollinators, honey bees are well-established insect models for studying learning and memory, behavior, caste differentiation, epigenetic mechanisms, olfactory biology, sex determination, and eusociality. Despite their importance to agriculture, knowledge of honey bee biology lags behind many other livestock species. In this study, we have used scRNA-Seq to map cell types to different developmental stages of the worker honey bee (prepupa at day 11 and pupa at day 15) and sought to determine their gene expression signatures. To identify cell-type populations, we examined the cell-to-cell network based on the similarity of the single-cells transcriptomic profiles. Grouping similar cells together we identified 63 different cell clusters of which 17 clusters were identifiable at both stages. To determine genes associated with specific cell populations or with a particular biological process involved in honey bee development, we used gene coexpression analysis. We combined this analysis with literature mining, the honey bee protein atlas, and gene ontology analysis to determine cell cluster identity. Of the cell clusters identified, 17 were related to the nervous system and sensory organs, 7 to the fat body, 19 to the cuticle, 5 to muscle, 4 to compound eye, 2 to midgut, 2 to hemocytes, and 1 to malpighian tubule/pericardial nephrocyte. To our knowledge, this is the first whole single-cell atlas of honey bees at any stage of development and demonstrates the potential for further work to investigate their biology at the cellular level.

Indexed as

EcosystemTranscriptomeAnimalsBeesPupaApis melliferadevelopmenthoney beemetamorphosisnetwork analysissingle-cell RNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID37548242
PMCPMC10542211
OpenAlexW4385620929

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.