Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548892›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2023

Collaborative PrEP Implementation Strategies for Latino Men Who have Sex with Men: A Health Center-Community Consensus Process.

Jonathan Ross, Gabriela S Betancourt, Elí A Andrade, Augustus Klein, Lissette Marrero, Gustavo A Morales, Sage Rivera, Dana L Watnick, Viraj V Patel

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Not a Monolith: Regional HIV Implementation Science Lessons With Latino/a/x Populations.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan RossDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, 3300 Kossuth Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA. joross@montefiore.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-3048
Gabriela S BetancourtLatino Commission on AIDS, New York, NY, USA.
Elí A AndradeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, 3300 Kossuth Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
Augustus KleinHunter Alliance for Research and Translation, Hunter College, New York, NY, USA.
Lissette MarreroVoces Latinas Inc, Jackson Heights, NY, USA.
Gustavo A MoralesLatino Commission on AIDS, New York, NY, USA.
Sage RiveraDestination Tomorrow, Bronx, NY, USA.
Dana L WatnickDepartment of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Viraj V PatelDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, 3300 Kossuth Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USLatino Commission on AIDS · USEnzo Life Sciences (United States) · USHunter College · USTomorrows Children’s Fund · US

Funding

Patient and Population Health Outcomes Research SWGP30AI124414 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI Joan Weinberger Berman · 2017 to 2026
$28.3M
Minimizing losses from HIV care under universal treatment in RwandaK23MH114752 · NIMH · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI ROSS, JONATHAN · 2017 to 2021
$995k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI124414NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH114752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-based organizations (CBOs) deliver services in culturally-responsive ways, and could effectively partner with health centers to deliver HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to Latino men who have sex with men (LMSM). However, few such models exist. We conducted a planning study in collaboration with three CBOs serving LMSM to identify optimal PrEP delivery strategies for health centers and CBOs to implement jointly. We established a Community Expert Panel (CEP) of eight client-facing CBO and health center staff. Over 6 months, the panel met monthly to identify collaborative strategies for PrEP delivery, using a modified Delphi method consisting of the following steps: (1) brainstorming strategies; (2) rating strategies on acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility; (3) review of data from qualitative focus group discussions with CBO clients; and (4) final strategy selection. The panel initially identified 25 potential strategies spread across three categories: improving communication between health centers and CBOs; using low-barrier PrEP options (e.g. telemedicine), and developing locally-relevant, culturally-sensitive outreach materials. Focus groups with CBO clients highlighted a desire for flexible options for PrEP-related care and emphasized trust in CBOs. The final package of strategies consisted of: (1) a web-based referral tool; (2) telemedicine appointments; (3) geographically-convenient options for lab specimen collection; (4) tailored print and social media; and (5) regular coaching sessions with CBO staff. Through a community-engaged process, we identified a package of PrEP delivery strategies that CBOs and health centers can implement in partnership, which have the potential to overcome barriers to PrEP for LMSM.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisCommunity Health CentersFocus GroupsHispanic or LatinoHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleAnti-HIV AgentsCommunity-based organizationDelphi techniqueHIVLatinoPre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID37548892
PMCPMC10558404
OpenAlexW4385617215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.