Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37550415›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2023

Machine learning for genetics-based classification and treatment response prediction in cancer of unknown primary.

Intae Moon, Jaclyn LoPiccolo, Sylvan C Baca, Lynette M Sholl, Kenneth L Kehl, Michael J Hassett, David Liu, Deborah Schrag, Alexander Gusev

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic predictive models for cancer-related fatigue: current evidence and future directions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. SEOM-GECOD clinical guideline for cancer of unknown primary (update 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diagnosis of Lung Diseases in the Artificial Intelligence Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Intae MoonDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-9605
Jaclyn LoPiccoloDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Sylvan C BacaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Lynette M ShollDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-9735
Kenneth L KehlDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5339-9797
Michael J HassettDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David LiuDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0346-5033
Deborah SchragMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Alexander GusevDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. alexander_gusev@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-4620
Harvard University · USBroad Institute · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
(PQ3) A functional genomic approach to identification and interpretation of germline-tumor genetic interactionsR01CA227237 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI GUSEV, ALEXANDER, ZAITLEN, NOAH A · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Characterizing non-coding somatic and germline variant interactions in ovarian cancerR01CA244569 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI GAYTHER, SIMON ANDREW, GUSEV, ALEXANDER · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
Common biology underlying pleiotropic breast, prostate and ovarian cancer risk lociR01CA259058 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI MATTHEW L FREEDMAN, Simon Andrew Gayther · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227237NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244569NCI NIH HHS R01 CA259058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a type of cancer that cannot be traced back to its primary site and accounts for 3-5% of all cancers. Established targeted therapies are lacking for CUP, leading to generally poor outcomes. We developed OncoNPC, a machine-learning classifier trained on targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from 36,445 tumors across 22 cancer types from three institutions. Oncology NGS-based primary cancer-type classifier (OncoNPC) achieved a weighted F1 score of 0.942 for high confidence predictions ([Formula: see text]) on held-out tumor samples, which made up 65.2% of all the held-out samples. When applied to 971 CUP tumors collected at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, OncoNPC predicted primary cancer types with high confidence in 41.2% of the tumors. OncoNPC also identified CUP subgroups with significantly higher polygenic germline risk for the predicted cancer types and with significantly different survival outcomes. Notably, patients with CUP who received first palliative intent treatments concordant with their OncoNPC-predicted cancers had significantly better outcomes (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.348; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.210-0.570; P = [Formula: see text]). Furthermore, OncoNPC enabled a 2.2-fold increase in patients with CUP who could have received genomically guided therapies. OncoNPC thus provides evidence of distinct CUP subgroups and offers the potential for clinical decision support for managing patients with CUP.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Unknown PrimaryHumansMachine LearningProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID37550415
PMCPMC11484892
OpenAlexW4385628901

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.