Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37550669›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2023

Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer: a Western-center analysis.

Muhammer Ergenç, Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak, Muhammed İkbal Akın, Ece Elif Hekimoğlu, Çiğdem Ataizi Çelikel, Cumhur Yeğen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammer ErgençDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Başıbüyük Campus Başıbüyük Mah. Maltepe Başıbüyük Yolu Sok. No: 9/1 Maltepe 34854, Istanbul, Turkey. muhammerergenc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-0570
Tevfik Kıvılcım UprakDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Başıbüyük Campus Başıbüyük Mah. Maltepe Başıbüyük Yolu Sok. No: 9/1 Maltepe 34854, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6480-7431
Muhammed İkbal AkınDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Başıbüyük Campus Başıbüyük Mah. Maltepe Başıbüyük Yolu Sok. No: 9/1 Maltepe 34854, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9638-4031
Ece Elif HekimoğluMarmara University School of Medicine, Başıbüyük Campus Başıbüyük Mah. Maltepe Başıbüyük Yolu Sok. No: 9/1 Maltepe 34854, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5161-6102
Çiğdem Ataizi ÇelikelDepartment of Pathology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Başıbüyük Campus Başıbüyük Mah. Maltepe Başıbüyük Yolu Sok. No: 9/1 Maltepe 34854, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9360-8116
Cumhur YeğenDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Başıbüyük Campus Başıbüyük Mah. Maltepe Başıbüyük Yolu Sok. No: 9/1 Maltepe 34854, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-0940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging is the central gastric cancer (GC) staging system, but it has some disadvantages. However, the lymph node ratio (LNR) can be used regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy and is considered an important prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients who underwent curative GC surgery.

methodsAll patients who underwent radical gastric surgery between January 2014 and June 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinicopathological features of tumors, TNM stage, and survival rates were analyzed. LNR was defined as the ratio between metastatic lymph nodes and total lymph nodes removed. The LNR groups were classified as follows: LNR0 = 0, 0.01 < LNR1 ≤ 0.1, 0.1 < LNR2 ≤ 0.25 and LNR3 > 0.25. Tumor characteristics and overall survival (OS) of the patients were compared between LNR groups.

resultsAfter exclusion, 333 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 62 ± 14 years. According to the LNR classification, no difference was found between groups regarding age and sex. However, TNM stage III disease was significantly more common in LNR3 patients. Most patients (43.2%, n = 144) were in the LNR3 group. In terms of tumor characteristics (lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion), the LNR3 group had significantly poorer prognostic factors. The Cox regression model defined LNR3, TNM stage II-III disease, and advanced age as independent risk factors for survival. Patients with LNR3 demonstrated the lowest 5-year OS rate (35.7%) (estimated mean survival was 30 ± 1.9 months) compared to LNR 0-1-2.

conclusionOur study showed that a high LNR was significantly associated with poor OS in patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. LNR can be used as an independent prognostic predictor in GC patients.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAgedHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph Node RatioLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesGastrectomyLymph node ratioMetastatic lymph node ratioPrognosisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID37550669
PMCPMC10408136

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.