Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37552293›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2023

Clinical and biological parameters associated with fracture recurrence according to fracture liaison service dataset.

Marie Doussiere, Claire Jesson, Laetitia Diep, Jimmy Menis, Corinne Fauvet, Patrice Fardellone, Vincent Goëb

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie DoussiereService de Rhumatologie, Université Picardie Jules Verne, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 80054, Amiens, France. doussiere.marie@chu-amiens.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5077-1370
Claire JessonService de Rhumatologie, Université Picardie Jules Verne, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 80054, Amiens, France.
Laetitia DiepService de Rhumatologie, Université Picardie Jules Verne, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 80054, Amiens, France.
Jimmy MenisService de Rhumatologie, Université Picardie Jules Verne, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 80054, Amiens, France.
Corinne FauvetService de Rhumatologie, Université Picardie Jules Verne, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 80054, Amiens, France.
Patrice FardelloneService de Rhumatologie, Université Picardie Jules Verne, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 80054, Amiens, France.
Vincent GoëbService de Rhumatologie, Université Picardie Jules Verne, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 80054, Amiens, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes the characteristics of 337 patients seen by the fracture liaison service of the Amiens University Hospital for at least two osteoporotic fractures between 2009 and 2019. Results showed that recurrent fracture occurs rapidly after the index fracture. Rheumatological and therapeutic managements are not sufficient, mainly because of cognitive disorders or patients' refusal. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients taken in charge by a fracture liaison service and sustaining a recurrent osteoporotic fracture.

methodsThis was a retrospective and monocentric study based on the dataset of patients included in the FLS of the Department of Rheumatology of the Amiens University Hospital. To be included in the study cohort, patients must have had at least two consecutive osteoporotic fractures between January 2009 and December 2019.

resultsThree hundred thirty-seven patients were included. The mean age at index fracture was 77.3 ± 12.5 years. Eighty-four percent of the patients were women. 89.3% of the patients had a Charlson comorbidity index between 1 and 4. Nearly half of the patients had cognitive disorders. Femoral neck was the most frequent site for both index and recurrent fractures. Thirty-seven percent of patients benefited from a consultation in Rheumatology after their index fracture. The main reasons for the lack of follow-up were cognitive disorders and patient rejection.

conclusionOur study showed that recurrent fracture occurs rapidly after the index fracture and that rheumatological and therapeutic managements are not sufficient, mainly because of cognitive disorders or patients' refusal impairing the patients to benefit from specialized management.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesRecurrenceAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesAnti-osteoporotic drugsFracture liaison serviceImminent fracture riskOsteoporosisRecurrent fracture

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.