Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555011›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2023

The genotype-phenotype correlations of the

Miriam Kessi, Baiyu Chen, Nan Pang, Lifen Yang, Jing Peng, Fang He, Fei Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Polymorphisms inGenes · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pin1 promotes human CaCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Article
  13. A Review of theDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. "Living with"Frontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Developing a pathway to clinical trials forTherapeutic advances in rare disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miriam KessiDepartment of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Baiyu ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Nan PangDepartment of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lifen YangDepartment of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jing PengDepartment of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Fang HeDepartment of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Fei YinDepartment of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Genotype-phenotype correlations of the Methods: Six children diagnosed with Results: Six patients were recruited from our hospital. Three cases presented with epilepsy, five with GDD/ID, five with ataxia, and two with ASD. The variants included p.G701R, p.R279C, p.D1644N, p.Y62C, p.L1422Sfs*8, and p. R1664Q [two gain-of-function (GOF) and four loss-of-function (LOF) variants]. About 187 individuals with GDD/ID harboring 123 variants were found (case series plus data from literature). Of those 123 variants, p.A713T and p.R1664* were recurrent, 37 were LOF, and 7 were GOF. GOF variants were linked with severe-profound GDD/ID while LOF variants were associated with mild-moderate GDD/ID ( Conclusion: The p.A713T variant is linked with severe-profound GDD/ID. More than half of

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderCACNA1Aepilepsygenotype–phenotype correlationsglobal developmental delayintellectual disability

Identifiers

PMID37555011
PMCPMC10406136

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.