ArticlePloS one2023
Heuristic-enabled active machine learning: A case study of predicting essential developmental stage and immune response genes in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid machine learning model with attention mechanism and multidimensional multivariate feature coding for essential gene prediction.BMC biology · 2025Article
- An optimized deep-forest algorithm using a modified differential evolution optimization algorithm: A case of host-pathogen protein-protein interaction prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Combination of computational techniques and RNAi reveal targets in Anopheles gambiae for malaria vector control.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational prediction of absolute essential genes using machine learning has gained wide attention in recent years. However, essential genes are mostly conditional and not absolute. Experimental techniques provide a reliable approach of identifying conditionally essential genes; however, experimental methods are laborious, time and resource consuming, hence computational techniques have been used to complement the experimental methods. Computational techniques such as supervised machine learning, or flux balance analysis are grossly limited due to the unavailability of required data for training the model or simulating the conditions for gene essentiality. This study developed a heuristic-enabled active machine learning method based on a light gradient boosting model to predict essential immune response and embryonic developmental genes in Drosophila melanogaster. We proposed a new sampling selection technique and introduced a heuristic function which replaces the human component in traditional active learning models. The heuristic function dynamically selects the unlabelled samples to improve the performance of the classifier in the next iteration. Testing the proposed model with four benchmark datasets, the proposed model showed superior performance when compared to traditional active learning models (random sampling and uncertainty sampling). Applying the model to identify conditionally essential genes, four novel essential immune response genes and a list of 48 novel genes that are essential in embryonic developmental condition were identified. We performed functional enrichment analysis of the predicted genes to elucidate their biological processes and the result evidence our predictions. Immune response and embryonic development related processes were significantly enriched in the essential immune response and embryonic developmental genes, respectively. Finally, we propose the predicted essential genes for future experimental studies and use of the developed tool accessible at http://heal.covenantuniversity.edu.ng for conditional essentiality predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.