ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2023
CTLA-4 and its inhibitors in esophageal cancer: efficacy of therapy and potential mechanisms of adverse events.
Review in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on the compositional characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment and immunopredictive models in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Unveiling the Scientific Landscape and Trends of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Bibliometric Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Prognostic analysis of first-recurrence/metastasis esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: chemoimmunotherapy combined with radiotherapy as one of the optimal clinical management strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy resistance of esophageal carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Association between tumor volume changes during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and survival outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Emerging Targeted and Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Immune evasion in cancer: mechanisms and cutting-edge therapeutic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Mechanisms of tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment formation in esophageal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Understanding immune checkpoints and PD-1/PD-L1-mediated immune resistance towards tumour immunotherapy.3 Biotech · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is one of the most prevalent diseases in the world, and its prognosis remains poor. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are the most common treatment strategies for esophageal cancer. Although these conventional treatment methods are sometimes beneficial, patients with esophageal cancer still have a high risk of local relapse and metastasis. Thus, novel and effective therapies are needed. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a type of immunotherapy being studied as a treatment for patients with advanced cancers, and strategies using such inhibitors have rapidly progressed to be recognized as transformative treatments for various cancers in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy have become the first-line and second-line treatment strategies for advanced esophageal cancer. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors have also been recognized as another option for patients with terminal esophageal cancer who cannot benefit from chemotherapy, and they even have potential benefits as a novel neoadjuvant treatment option for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Currently, there are two types of immune checkpoint inhibitors commonly applied in clinical practice: immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 and immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4. However, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immune checkpoint inhibitors are rarely used compared with programmed death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors in esophageal cancer and other cancers, and the clinical benefit is unclear. We analyzed and summarized the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Due to the lack of clinical applications, it is expected that cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with other treatments may provide superior benefits and improve the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37559996PMC10408473What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.