Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37560211›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023

Comparison analysis of safety profiles and identification of risk factors for postoperative adverse reactions: propofol versus sevoflurane in pediatric anesthesia.

Xuan Xu, Haodong Liu, Jie Yang, Maopeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xuan XuDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China.
Haodong LiuDepartment of Anesthesia and Operating Room, Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital No. 2, East Section of Xinjian Road, Weibin District, Baoji 721000, Shaanxi, China.
Jie YangDepartment of Anesthesia and Operating Room, Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital No. 2, East Section of Xinjian Road, Weibin District, Baoji 721000, Shaanxi, China.
Maopeng ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia and Operating Room, Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital No. 2, East Section of Xinjian Road, Weibin District, Baoji 721000, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the safety profiles between propofol and sevoflurane in pediatric anesthesia and to investigate risk factors for postoperative adverse reactions.

methodsThe data of 194 children who received surgical treatment in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2019 and May 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different anesthetic drugs the children received, they were divided into a control group (conventional anesthesia with sevoflurane, n=94) and an observation group (anesthesia with both propofol and sevoflurane, n=100). The two groups were compared in terms of anesthetic effect, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) score during the recovery of anesthesia, and anesthesia safety. Further, the children were grouped based on RSS score to identify the risk factors for agitation during the recovery of anesthesia via logistics regression.

resultsThe onset time of anesthesia, spontaneous breathing recovery time, extubation time, eye opening time and awake time in the observation group were all significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). At T1 (during anesthesia induction), T2 (after tracheal intubation) and T3 (after extubation), the observation group showed relatively stable heart rate and blood oxygen saturation than the control group (P<0.05). At the time of awakening, extubation and 30 minutes after extubation, the observation group exhibited significantly lower RSS score than the control group (P<0.05). The observation group also showed a significantly lower incidence of nausea, vomiting and agitation than the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, age ≤6 years old and anesthesia scheme were independent risks for agitation in children during the recovery of anesthesia. The occurrence group had significantly higher risk scores than the non-occurrence group (P<0.05). According to receiver operating characteristic curve-based analysis, the area under the curve of risk score in predicting agitation during the recovery of anesthesia was 0.733.

conclusionAnesthesia with both propofol and sevoflurane is effective in children undergoing surgical treatment, because the combination can substantially reduce the agitation of children during the recovery of anesthesia and has high anesthesia safety. Propofol combined with sevoflurane is a protective factor against agitation in children during the recovery of anesthesia.

Indexed as

adverse reactionsagitation during the recovery of anesthesiapediatric anesthesiaPropofolsevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID37560211
PMCPMC10408521

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.