Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37560437›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023

Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D, including the derivation of a conversion factor for calcidiol monohydrate.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and FoodAllergens (NDA), Dominique Turck, Torsten Bohn, Jacqueline Castenmiller, Stefaan de Henauw, Karen-Ildico Hirsch-Ernst, Helle Katrine Knutsen, Alexandre Maciuk, Inge Mangelsdorf, Harry J McArdle and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Safety of UV-treated oil from yellow mealworm (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vitamin D-is the sun enough for us?Nutrition & metabolism · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Current Knowledge of the Impact of Vitamin D in Coronary Artery Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and FoodAllergens (NDA)
Dominique Turck
Torsten Bohn
Jacqueline Castenmiller
Stefaan de Henauw
Karen-Ildico Hirsch-Ernst
Helle Katrine Knutsen
Alexandre Maciuk
Inge Mangelsdorf
Harry J McArdle
Kristina Pentieva
Alfonso Siani
Frank Thies
Sophia Tsabouri
Marco Vinceti
Susan Lanham-New
Giovanni Passeri
Ionut Craciun
Lucia Fabiani
Rita Ferreira De Sousa
Laura Martino
Silvia Valtueña Martínez
Androniki Naska

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following two requests from the European Commission (EC), the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the revision of the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin D and to propose a conversion factor (CF) for calcidiol monohydrate into vitamin D

Indexed as

calcidiol monohydratecholecalciferolconversion factorErgocalciferoltolerable upper intake level

Identifiers

PMID37560437
PMCPMC10407748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.