Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563596›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2023

Competing risks analysis for neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of diabetic retinopathy incidence in the Scottish population.

Aravind Lathika Rajendrakumar, Simona M Hapca, Anand Thakarakkattil Narayanan Nair, Yu Huang, Mehul Kumar Chourasia, Ryan Shun-Yuen Kwan, Charvi Nangia, Moneeza K Siddiqui, Prathiba Vijayaraghavan, Shona Z Matthew and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lower Hippocampal Volume Partly Mediates the Association Between rs6859 in themedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Aravind Lathika RajendrakumarDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Simona M HapcaDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Anand Thakarakkattil Narayanan NairDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Yu HuangDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Mehul Kumar ChourasiaDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Ryan Shun-Yuen KwanDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Charvi NangiaDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Moneeza K SiddiquiDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Prathiba VijayaraghavanMadras Diabetes Research Foundation, Gopalapuram, Chennai, India.
Shona Z MatthewUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Graham P LeeseDepartment of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Viswanathan MohanMadras Diabetes Research Foundation, Gopalapuram, Chennai, India.
Ewan R PearsonDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Alexander S F DoneyDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Colin N A PalmerDivision of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. c.n.a.palmer@dundee.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6415-6560
University of Dundee · GBMadras Diabetes Research Foundation · INQueen Mary University of London · GBSocial Science Research Council · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major sight-threatening microvascular complication in individuals with diabetes. Systemic inflammation combined with oxidative stress is thought to capture most of the complexities involved in the pathology of diabetic retinopathy. A high level of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indicator of abnormal immune system activity. Current estimates of the association of NLR with diabetes and its complications are almost entirely derived from cross-sectional studies, suggesting that the nature of the reported association may be more diagnostic than prognostic. Therefore, in the present study, we examined the utility of NLR as a biomarker to predict the incidence of DR in the Scottish population.

methodsThe incidence of DR was defined as the time to the first diagnosis of R1 or above grade in the Scottish retinopathy grading scheme from type 2 diabetes diagnosis. The effect of NLR and its interactions were explored using a competing risks survival model adjusting for other risk factors and accounting for deaths. The Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model (FGR) was used to predict the effect of NLR on the incidence of DR.

resultsWe analysed data from 23,531 individuals with complete covariate information. At 10 years, 8416 (35.8%) had developed DR and 2989 (12.7%) were lost to competing events (death) without developing DR and 12,126 individuals did not have DR. The median (interquartile range) level of NLR was 2.04 (1.5 to 2.7). The optimal NLR cut-off value to predict retinopathy incidence was 3.04. After accounting for competing risks at 10 years, the cumulative incidence of DR and deaths without DR were 50.7% and 21.9%, respectively. NLR was associated with incident DR in both Cause-specific hazard (CSH = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.28-2.07) and FGR models the subdistribution hazard (sHR = 2.24; 95% CI: 1.70-2.94). Both age and HbA

conclusionsThe current study suggests that NLR has a promising potential to predict DR incidence in the Scottish population, especially in individuals less than 65 years and in those with well-controlled glycaemic status.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIncidenceLymphocytesNeutrophilsRisk FactorsScotlandCause-specific hazard ratioCompeting risksDiabetic retinopathyNeutrophil–lymphocyte ratioSubdistribution hazard ratio

Identifiers

PMID37563596
PMCPMC10413718
OpenAlexW4385724556

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.