Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37564083›Full record

ArticleRadiologia brasileira

The 2021 World Health Organization classification of gliomas: an imaging approach.

Renata Tarraf Fernandes, Gustavo Ramos Teixeira, Esther Cecin Mamere, Gabriela Alencar Bandeira, Augusto Elias Mamere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renata Tarraf FernandesHospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4823-9873
Gustavo Ramos TeixeiraHospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8363-3513
Esther Cecin MamereUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8480-7773
Gabriela Alencar BandeiraInstituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9605-1915
Augusto Elias MamereHospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9111-6700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this pictorial essay is to describe the recommendations of the 2021 World Health Organization classification for adult-type and pediatric-type gliomas and to discuss the main modifications in relation to the previous (2016) classification, exemplified by imaging, histological, and molecular findings in nine patients followed at our institutions. In recent years, molecular biomarkers have gained importance in the diagnosis and classification of gliomas, mainly because they have been shown to correlate with the biological behavior and prognosis of such tumors. It is important for neuroradiologists to familiarize themselves with this new classification of central nervous system tumors, so that they can use this knowledge in evaluating and reporting the imaging examinations of patients with glioma.

Indexed as

Astrocytoma/classificationCentral nervous system neoplasms/classificationGlioblastoma/classificationGlioma/classification

Identifiers

PMID37564083
PMCPMC10411771

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.