ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023
Comparative transcriptome characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated transcriptomic analysis identifies liver aging-driven fibrosis signatures and reveals therapeutic strategies based on medicine-food homology.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
- MicroRNA Enrichment and Docking-Based Evaluation of Ilomastat Targeting of MMP-2 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Insights from a South African Cohort.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Evaluating Potential Therapeutic Targets and Drug Repurposing Based on the Esophageal Cancer Subtypes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- scTail: precise polyadenylation site detection and its alternative usage analysis from reads 1 preserved 3' scRNA-seq data.Genome biology · 2025Article
- MFAP2 promotes the progress of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by enhancing PTGS2 signaling.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- YY2 Serves as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker Correlated with Immune Microenvironment and Glycolysis in Esophageal Carcinoma.Current genomics · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Potential of Migrasomes: A Machine-Learning-Driven Signature for Diagnosing Acute Myocardial Infarction.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Leveraging a neutrophil-derived PCD signature to predict and stratify patients with acute myocardial infarction: from AI prediction to biological interpretation.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Construction of an economical xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its ethanol fermentation.FEMS yeast research · 2024Article
- Identification of markers correlating with mitochondrial function in myocardial infarction by bioinformatics.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal cancers are primarily categorized as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). While various (epi) genomic alterations associated with tumor development in ESCC and EAC have been documented, a comprehensive comparison of the transcriptomes in these two cancer subtypes remains lacking. Methods: We collected 551 gene expression profiles from publicly available sources, including normal, ESCC, and EAC tissues or cell lines. Subsequently, we conducted a systematic analysis to compare the transcriptomes of these samples at various levels, including gene expression, promoter activity, alternative splicing (AS), alternative polyadenylation (APA), and gene fusion. Results: Seven distinct cluster gene expression patterns were identified among the differentially expressed genes in normal, ESCC, and EAC tissues. These patterns were enriched in the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and the activation of extracellular matrix organization and exhibited repression of epidermal development. Notably, we observed additional genes or unique expression levels enriched in these shared pathways and biological processes related to tumor development and immune activation. In addition to the differentially expressed genes, there was an enrichment of lncRNA co-expression networks and downregulation of promoter activity associated with the repression of epidermal development in both ESCC and EAC. This indicates a common feature between these two cancer subtypes. Furthermore, differential AS and APA patterns in ESCC and EAC appear to partially affect the expression of host genes associated with bacterial or viral infections in these subtypes. No gene fusions were observed between ESCC and EAC, thus highlighting the distinct molecular mechanisms underlying these two cancer subtypes. Conclusions: We conducted a comprehensive comparison of ESCC and EAC transcriptomes and uncovered shared and distinct transcriptomic signatures at multiple levels. These findings suggest that ESCC and EAC may exhibit common and unique mechanisms involved in tumorigenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.