ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2023
A review on deep learning applications in highly multiplexed tissue imaging data analysis.
Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cohort-Scale Spatial Autocorrelation for Tumor Prediction in Mid-Infrared Pathology and Spatial Biomarker Discovery Using MALDI Imaging Lipidomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Deep neural networks to register and annotate cells in moving and deforming nervous systems.eLife · 2026Article
- High-dimensional imaging using combinatorial channel multiplexing and deep learning.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Spatial proteomics: technical evolution and applications in cancer research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Deep learning in multi-omics integration for gastrointestinal cancer biomarker discovery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- The evolving landscape of spatial proteomics technologies in the AI age.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- A deep learning-based multiscale integration of spatial omics with tumor morphology.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Effects of segmentation errors on downstream-analysis in highly-multiplexed tissue imaging.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based tissue segmentation and cell identification in multiplex-stained histological endometriosis sections.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, and Machine Learning to Support the Analysis of Microscopic Images of Cells and Tissues.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- From infectious diseases to chronic diseases: the paradigm shift of spatial epidemiology in disease prevention and control.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- ImmuNet: a segmentation-free machine learning pipeline for immune landscape phenotyping in tumors by multiplex imaging.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Integrating spatial omics with routine haematoxylin and eosin in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded: a step-by-step clinical workflow.F1000Research · 2025Review
- Spatial analysis by current multiplexed imaging technologies for the molecular characterisation of cancer tissues.British journal of cancer · 2024Review
- Insights into Calpain Activation and Rho-ROCK Signaling in Parkinson's Disease and Aging.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its introduction into the field of oncology, deep learning (DL) has impacted clinical discoveries and biomarker predictions. DL-driven discoveries and predictions in oncology are based on a variety of biological data such as genomics, proteomics, and imaging data. DL-based computational frameworks can predict genetic variant effects on gene expression, as well as protein structures based on amino acid sequences. Furthermore, DL algorithms can capture valuable mechanistic biological information from several spatial "omics" technologies, such as spatial transcriptomics and spatial proteomics. Here, we review the impact that the combination of artificial intelligence (AI) with spatial omics technologies has had on oncology, focusing on DL and its applications in biomedical image analysis, encompassing cell segmentation, cell phenotype identification, cancer prognostication, and therapy prediction. We highlight the advantages of using highly multiplexed images (spatial proteomics data) compared to single-stained, conventional histopathological ("simple") images, as the former can provide deep mechanistic insights that cannot be obtained by the latter, even with the aid of explainable AI. Furthermore, we provide the reader with the advantages/disadvantages of DL-based pipelines used in preprocessing highly multiplexed images (cell segmentation, cell type annotation). Therefore, this review also guides the reader to choose the DL-based pipeline that best fits their data. In conclusion, DL continues to be established as an essential tool in discovering novel biological mechanisms when combined with technologies such as highly multiplexed tissue imaging data. In balance with conventional medical data, its role in clinical routine will become more important, supporting diagnosis and prognosis in oncology, enhancing clinical decision-making, and improving the quality of care for patients. Since its introduction into the field of oncology, deep learning (DL) has impacted clinical discoveries and biomarker predictions. DL-driven discoveries and predictions in oncology are based on a variety of biological data such as genomics, proteomics, and imaging data. DL-based computational frameworks can predict genetic variant effects on gene expression, as well as protein structures based on amino acid sequences. Furthermore, DL algorithms can capture valuable mechanistic biological information from several spatial "omics" technologies, such as spatial transcriptomics and spatial proteomics. Here, we review the impact that the combination of artificial intelligence (AI) with spatial omics technologies has had on oncology, focusing on DL and its applications in biomedical image analysis, encompassing cell segmentation, cell phenotype identification, cancer prognostication, and therapy prediction. We highlight the advantages of using highly multiplexed images (spatial proteomics data) compared to single-stained, conventional histopathological ("simple") images, as the former can provide deep mechanistic insights that cannot be obtained by the latter, even with the aid of explainable AI. Furthermore, we provide the reader with the advantages/disadvantages of the DL-based pipelines used in preprocessing the highly multiplexed images (cell segmentation, cell type annotation). Therefore, this review also guides the reader to choose the DL-based pipeline that best fits their data. In conclusion, DL continues to be established as an essential tool in discovering novel biological mechanisms when combined with technologies such as highly multiplexed tissue imaging data. In balance with conventional medical data, its role in clinical routine will become more important, supporting diagnosis and prognosis in oncology, enhancing clinical decision-making, and improving the quality of care for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.