Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37566127›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2023

Transarterial interventional therapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without anti-PD-1 antibodies as initial treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein tumor thrombosis: a single-center retrospective study.

Wenchang Yu, Weifu Liu, Kongzhi Zhang, Shiguang Chen, Xiaolong Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenchang YuDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Biotherapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China. ywch@fjzlhospital.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8239-6325
Weifu LiuDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Biotherapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Kongzhi ZhangDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Biotherapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Shiguang ChenDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Biotherapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Xiaolong WangDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Biotherapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transarterial interventional therapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-Pd-1 antibodies (triplet regimen) has shown promising results in advanced HCC. However, the clinical utility of the triplet regimen in patients with HCC and major portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remains unclear. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the triplet regimen versus transarterial interventional therapy combined with TKIs (double regimen) for such patients. Thirty-nine patients treated with the triplet regimen were retrospectively compared with 37 patients treated with the double regimen. The objective response rate (ORR), the response rate of PVTT treatment, and safety were observed; progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test. Predictors of survival were identified using multivariate analysis. Median OS and median PFS were significantly improved in the Triplet Group compared with the Double Group (482 vs. 310 days; 208 vs. 85 days). The ORR and the response rate of PVTT were significantly higher in the Triplet Group than in the Double Group (59% vs. 35%; 62% vs. 35%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between the two groups (33% vs. 21%). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (10%) in the Triplet Group and hand-foot syndrome (14%) in the Double Group. Multivariable analysis showed that treatment method and PVTT treatment response were significant predictors of OS. The triplet regimen showed superiority over the doublet regimen in improving OS and PFS and had acceptable safety in patients with HCC and major PVTT.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsVenous ThrombosisHumansPortal VeinRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsHepatocellular carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyPortal vein tumor thrombosisTransarterial interventional therapyTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37566127
PMCPMC10991362
OpenAlexW4385751138

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.