Evidence mapPaperPMID 37568322Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Identification of Medication Prescription Errors and Factors of Clinical Relevance in 314 Hospitalized Patients for Improved Multidimensional Clinical Decision Support Algorithms.

Stefan Russmann, Fabiana Martinelli, Franziska Jakobs, Manjinder Pannu, David F Niedrig, Andrea Michelle Burden, Martina Kleber, Markus Béchir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefan RussmannSwiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ), 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8943-9831
Fabiana MartinelliSwiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ), 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Franziska JakobsSwiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ), 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Manjinder PannuFaculty of Medicine, University of Nicosia, 2408 Egkomi, Cyprus.
David F NiedrigDrugsafety.ch, Seestrasse 221, 8703 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
Andrea Michelle BurdenSwiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ), 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7082-8530
Martina KleberDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinic Hirslanden Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus BéchirFaculty of Medicine, University of Nicosia, 2408 Egkomi, Cyprus.
University of Nicosia · CYChest Diseases Hospital · KWUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potential medication errors and related adverse drug events (ADE) pose major challenges in clinical medicine. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) help identify preventable prescription errors leading to ADEs but are typically characterized by high sensitivity and low specificity, resulting in poor acceptance and alert-overriding. With this cross-sectional study we aimed to analyze CDSS performance, and to identify factors that may increase CDSS specificity. Clinical pharmacology services evaluated current pharmacotherapy of 314 patients during hospitalization across three units of two Swiss tertiary care hospitals. We used two CDSSs (pharmaVISTA and MediQ), primarily for the evaluation of drug-drug interactions (DDI). Additionally, we evaluated potential drug-disease, drug-age, drug-food, and drug-gene interactions. Recommendations for change of therapy were forwarded without delay to treating physicians. Among 314 patients, automated analyses by both CDSSs produced an average of 15.5 alerts per patient. In contrast, additional expert evaluation resulted in only 0.8 recommendations per patient to change pharmacotherapy. For clinical pharmacology experts, co-factors such as comorbidities and laboratory results were decisive for the classification of CDSS alerts as clinically relevant in individual patients in about 70% of all decisions. Such co-factors should therefore be used for the development of multidimensional CDSS alert algorithms with improved specificity. In combination with local expert services, this poses a promising approach to improve drug safety in clinical practice.

Indexed as

adverse drug eventsclinical decision supportclinical medicineclinical pharmacologydose adjustmentdrug interactionsmedication errorsMediQpharmaVISTA

Identifiers

PMID37568322
PMCPMC10419486
OpenAlexW4385308094

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.