ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Improving the Accuracy of Continuous Blood Glucose Measurement Using Personalized Calibration and Machine Learning.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges of Wearable Biosensors and Ways to Overcome Them.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Feedback Control over Plasma Drug Concentrations Achieves Rapid and Accurate Control over Solid-Tissue Drug Concentrations.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Interplay of hypoxia, immune dysregulation, and metabolic stress in pathophysiology of type 1 diabetes.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Role of Machine Learning Assisted Biosensors in Point-of-Care-Testing For Clinical Decisions.ACS sensors · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite tremendous developments in continuous blood glucose measurement (CBGM) sensors, they are still not accurate for all patients with diabetes. As glucose concentration in the blood is <1% of the total blood volume, it is challenging to accurately measure glucose levels in the interstitial fluid using CBGM sensors due to within-patient and between-patient variations. To address this issue, we developed a novel data-driven approach to accurately predict CBGM values using personalized calibration and machine learning. First, we scientifically divided measured blood glucose into smaller groups, namely, hypoglycemia (<80 mg/dL), nondiabetic (81-115 mg/dL), prediabetes (116-150 mg/dL), diabetes (151-181 mg/dL), severe diabetes (181-250 mg/dL), and critical diabetes (>250 mg/dL). Second, we separately trained each group using different machine learning models based on patients' personalized parameters, such as physical activity, posture, heart rate, breath rate, skin temperature, and food intake. Lastly, we used multilayer perceptron (MLP) for the D1NAMO dataset (training to test ratio: 70:30) and grid search for hyperparameter optimization to predict accurate blood glucose concentrations. We successfully applied our proposed approach in nine patients with type 1 diabetes and observed that the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) decreased from 17.8% to 8.3%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.