ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Predicting the Effect of Single Mutations on Protein Stability and Binding with Respect to Types of Mutations.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrostatics and disease: Large-scale assessment of human missense variants causing protein charge alterations and their implications for disease.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Cancer-associated TRF1 mutations alter PARP1 interaction dynamics: an in silico study.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Systematic evaluation of predictors for binding free energy changes upon mutations in protein complexes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder: Revealing the Molecular Mechanism of Pathogenic Variants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Computational prediction of deleterious nonsynonymous SNPs in the CTNS gene: implications for cystinosis.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
- Article
- Enhanced Disease Resistance Mechanism of the CmoAP2/ERF Transcription Factor in Pumpkin through Genetic Mutations.ACS omega · 2024Article
- SAAMBE-MEM: a sequence-based method for predicting binding free energy change upon mutation in membrane protein-protein complexes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Prediction of mutation-induced protein stability changes based on the geometric representations learned by a self-supervised method.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- AlphaFold2-Enabled Atomistic Modeling of Structure, Conformational Ensembles, and Binding Energetics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.86 Spike Protein with ACE2 Host Receptor and Antibodies: Compensatory Functional Effects of Binding Hotspots in Modulating Mechanisms of Receptor Binding and Immune Escape.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Assessing computational tools for predicting protein stability changes upon missense mutations using a new dataset.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The development of methods and algorithms to predict the effect of mutations on protein stability, protein-protein interaction, and protein-DNA/RNA binding is necessitated by the needs of protein engineering and for understanding the molecular mechanism of disease-causing variants. The vast majority of the leading methods require a database of experimentally measured folding and binding free energy changes for training. These databases are collections of experimental data taken from scientific investigations typically aimed at probing the role of particular residues on the above-mentioned thermodynamic characteristics, i.e., the mutations are not introduced at random and do not necessarily represent mutations originating from single nucleotide variants (SNV). Thus, the reported performance of the leading algorithms assessed on these databases or other limited cases may not be applicable for predicting the effect of SNVs seen in the human population. Indeed, we demonstrate that the SNVs and non-SNVs are not equally presented in the corresponding databases, and the distribution of the free energy changes is not the same. It is shown that the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) of folding and binding free energy changes obtained in cases involving SNVs are smaller than for non-SNVs, indicating that caution should be used in applying them to reveal the effect of human SNVs. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that some methods are sensitive to the chemical nature of the mutations, resulting in PCCs that differ by a factor of four across chemically different mutations. All methods are found to underestimate the energy changes by roughly a factor of 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.