Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37569624›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

The Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis 2.0 for Alzheimer's Disease and Aging-Associated Cognitive Decline: From Molecular Basis to Effective Therapy.

Vladimir Volloch, Sophia Rits-Volloch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of BACE2 polymorphisms on verbal memory in the general population.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neurodegenerative Disease: From Molecular Basis to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vladimir VollochDepartment of Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Sophia Rits-VollochDivision of Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Harvard University · US

Funding

STRUCTURE OF TYPE I AND TYPE II PROCOLLAGENSR01AR036819 · NIAMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI OLSEN, BJORN REINO · 1986 to 2016
$8.7M
GLOBIN MRNA HYPERPRODUCTION IN RESPONSE TO ANEMIAR21GM056179 · NIGMS · BOSTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VOLLOCH, VLADIMIR Z · 1997 to 1997
–
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR036819NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM056179NIH HHS R21 GM056179; RO1 AR036819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the long-standing amyloid cascade hypothesis (ACH) largely discredited, there is an acute need for a new all-encompassing interpretation of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Whereas such a recently proposed theory of AD is designated ACH2.0, its commonality with the ACH is limited to the recognition of the centrality of amyloid-β (Aβ) in the disease, necessitated by the observation that

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgingAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMiceAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein Precursoraging-related cognitive dysfunction (AACD)Aβ protein precursor (AβPP)-independent generation of iAβBACE1 and BACE2 activators as AD and AACD drugsiAβ depletion therapy for AD and AACDintraneuronal Aβ (iAβ)the amyloid cascade hypothesis 2.0 (ACH2.0)

Identifiers

PMID37569624
PMCPMC10419172
OpenAlexW4385428607

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.