ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
SLAMICP Library: Accelerating Obstacle Detection in Mobile Robot Navigation via Outlier Monitoring following ICP Localization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Performance Evaluation of Multi-Type LiDAR Sensors and Their Applicability to Sidewalk HD Mapping.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ICP-Based Mapping and Localization System for AGV with 2D LiDAR.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing LiDAR Mapping with YOLO-Based Potential Dynamic Object Removal in Autonomous Driving.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of Indoor COSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Analytical Formalism for Data Representation and Object Detection with 2D LiDAR: Application in Mobile Robotics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Path Planning of a Mobile Delivery Robot Operating in a Multi-Story Building Based on a Predefined Navigation Tree.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Iterative Closest Point (ICP) is a matching technique used to determine the transformation matrix that best minimizes the distance between two point clouds. Although mostly used for 2D and 3D surface reconstruction, this technique is also widely used for mobile robot self-localization by means of matching partial information provided by an onboard LIDAR scanner with a known map of the facility. Once the estimated position of the robot is obtained, the scans gathered by the LIDAR can be analyzed to locate possible obstacles obstructing the planned trajectory of the mobile robot. This work proposes to speed up the obstacle detection process by directly monitoring outliers (discrepant points between the LIDAR scans and the full map) spotted after ICP matching instead of spending time performing an isolated task to re-analyze the LIDAR scans to detect those discrepancies. In this work, a computationally optimized ICP implementation has been adapted to return the list of outliers along with other matching metrics, computed in an optimal way by taking advantage of the parameters already calculated in order to perform the ICP matching. The evaluation of this adapted ICP implementation in a real mobile robot application has shown that the time required to perform self-localization and obstacle detection has been reduced by 36.7% when obstacle detection is performed simultaneously with the ICP matching instead of implementing a redundant procedure for obstacle detection. The adapted ICP implementation is provided in the SLAMICP library.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.