ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Dupilumab effectively and rapidly treats bullous pemphigoid by inhibiting the activities of multiple cell types.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time to Disease Control with Dupilumab for Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Pooled it
- Mendelian Randomization and Experimental Validation Identify Key Immune Signatures in Bullous Pemphigoid.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Dupilumab Can Be Effective for Immune-Related Adverse Event Dermatitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Immuno-oncologyDupilumab for bullous pemphigoid related to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective case series.The oncologist · 2025Article
- IgG autoantibodies in bullous pemphigoid induce a pathogenic MyD88-dependent pro-inflammatory response in keratinocytes.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Aberrant Activation of Mast Cells: Molecular Mechanisms and Targets for Intervention.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Cutaneous Adverse Events Following Nemolizumab Administration: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A case of pembrolizumab-induced bullous pemphigoid treated with dupilumab.Skin health and disease · 2025Article
- Dupilumab-Induced Systemic Hypoperfusion in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Dupilumab as a treatment for bullous pemphigoid in a liver transplant recipient: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2025Article
- Omalizumab and Dupilumab for the Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Radiotherapy-induced localized bullous pemphigoid with a favorable response to dupilumab.JAAD case reports · 2024Article
- Dupilumab, corticosteroids and their combination for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune skin-blistering disease. Systemic corticosteroids remain the first line treatment for moderate-to-severe BP with the potential for severe adverse events. Dupilumab has emerged as an alternative option for BP patients. Objective: We evaluated the efficiency and safety of dupilumab on BP treatment and explored a mode of drug action in depth. Methods and results: A multicenter retrospective cohort included 20 BP patients who received dupilumab with or without systemic corticosteroid in dupilumab group, and 20 matched BP patients who received corticosteroid alone in conventional group. Serum samples were collected from 20 patients (10 from dupilumab group and 10 from conventional group) at baseline and week 4. Compared to systemic corticosteroid alone, dupilumab with or without systemic corticosteroid was similarly efficacious in clinical remission at week4 (complete remission plus partial remission: 100%) and week24 (complete remission plus partial remission:100%), but allowing significant decreases in the cumulative doses of corticosteroids with reducing the incidence of adverse events. However, dupilumab did not decrease BP180 antibody despite an obvious clinical improvement. Comparative plasma proteomic analysis performed before and after treatment in 3 BP patients from dupilumab group revealed that drug use was associated with 30 differentially expressed proteins, including 26 down-regulated and 4 up-regulated proteins. The former consisted of immune related proteins involved in T/B cell interactions (inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand, ICOSL) and in the activation of eosinophils (PRG2), mast cells (S100A12), and complement (CR2). TARC and ICOSL levels correlated with BP severity in patients who received either dupilumab or conventional treatment. Conclusion: Dupilumab has similar efficacy in treating BP as conventional drugs, by inhibiting the activities of many types of immune cells and complement, and regulating the interactions between T and B cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.